Russia issues new nuclear warning as contested Ukraine referendum ends 
https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/xpn2t1/russia_issues_new_nuclear_warning_as_contested/
https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/xpk7wx/russia_issues_new_nuclear_warning_as_contested/
https://old.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/xpha83/russia_issues_new_nuclear_warning_as_it_wraps_up/
https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/xp8t49/ukrainians_involved_in_russianbacked_referendums/
https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/xpfpso/russia_issues_new_nuclear_warning_as_it_wraps_up/
Generated from TLDR This:
Summary Putin ally issues stark new nuclear warning Says NATO would not enter war after nuclear strike Ukraine annexation votes finish up Undersea Russian gas pipelines mysteriously damaged LONDON/ZAPORIZHZHIA, Ukraine, Sept 27 (Reuters) - An ally of President Vladimir Putin issued a stark new nuclear warning to Ukraine and the West on Tuesday as Russia began releasing results of referendums it bills as a prelude to it annexing four Ukrainian regions.
REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko Read More Russian government officials have repeatedly warned they might use nuclear weapons if Kyiv's forces, who control some of the areas Moscow claims, try to take what Russia will soon regard as sovereign territory.
"...Where exactly should we evacuate people in the event of a Russian nuclear strike against Ukraine?"
Podolyak said Ukrainians who had helped Russia organise the annexation referendums would face treason charges and at least five years in jail.
Fighting raged in various parts of Ukraine on Tuesday.
Ukrainian forces in the south continued trying to keep bridges and other river crossings out of action to disrupt supply lines to Russian forces.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, let's create a nuclear apolocypse for their sake. Thanks, Ukraine. Very cool.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Less for Ukraine’s sake and more for making sure MAD survives Putin’s idiocy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure, but there is no credible threat when it's coming from a nation without nukes. If they were in NATO, okay, but it's not his place.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No, for everyones sake. Letting a country use tactical nukes aggressively with no response is the end of the world order.
At that point every nation on earh will go for nukes and the risk of nuclear war becomes 100%.
There has to be some response - a coventional response, but a response.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm taking qualms with a Ukrainian official bringing that up, as opposed to nuclear powers which have more or less expressed a willingness to use nukes if Putin gets more r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context