Not sure how legit it is coz i got it from a friend but found it funny enough so im sharing
A Johns Hopkins anesthesiologist and her spouse, a doctor and major in the U.S. Army, were federally indicted for attempting to provide medical information about members of the military to the Russian government.
Anna Gabrielian and Jamie Lee Henry, who had a secret security clearance as a doctor at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, communicated and met several times with an undercover FBI agent who they believed was from the Russian embassy, offering sensitive medical information on military members and their families, the indictment alleges.
Gabrielian, 36, touted the Rockville couple’s access to the health records as “a useful long-term weapon.”
During an initial Aug. 17 meeting in a Baltimore hotel room, Gabrielian told the agent “she was motivated by patriotism toward Russia to provide any assistance she could to Russia, even if it meant being fired or going to jail.”
Her spouse had access not just to medical information, she said, but insight into how the U.S. military establishes Army hospitals in war conditions and about training the military provided to Ukrainian military personnel. Henry participated in a second meeting later that night.
“My point of view is until the United States actually declares war against Russia, I’m able to help as much as I want,” Henry, 39, told the agent, according to the indictment. “At that point, I’ll have some ethical issues I’ll have to work through.”
“You’ll work through those ethical issues,” Gabrielian replied.
Henry also told the agent she had looked into volunteering to join the Russian Army after the conflict in Ukraine began.
In an Aug. 24 meeting with the agent at a Baltimore hotel room, Gabrielian called Henry a “coward” for being concerned about violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA,) a federal law that limits the disclosure of patients’ confidential medical information. She told the person she did not share those concerns because she violated the law “all the time.”
Gabrielian did fear what might happen to her and Henry’s children if she put herself at risk of arrest, demanding that the kids be put on “a nice flight to Turkey to go on vacation” if arrest seemed imminent. “I don’t want to end in jail here with my kids being hostages over my head,” she said, according to the indictment.
Gabrielian is listed as an instructor of anesthesiology and critical care medicine at Hopkins, and her profile page says she speaks Russian. Johns Hopkins Medicine did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Henry received attention in 2015 after becoming the first known active-duty Army officer to come out as transgender. A Buzzfeed article from that time said she was also to her knowledge and to the knowledge of LGBT advocates the first and only active duty service member who had changed her name and gender within the United States military.
During an Aug. 31 meeting at a hotel in Gaithersburg, Gabrielian provided the agent with medical information related to the spouse of a person currently employed by the Office of Naval Intelligence, and medical information related to someone only described as a veteran of the Air Force.
“Gabrielian highlighted to the [agent] a medical issue reflected in the records of [the military member’s spouse] that Russia could exploit.,” the indictment says.
During the same meeting, Henry also provided medical information related to five patients at Fort Bragg, including a retired Army officer, a current Department of Defense employee, and spouses of active and deceased Army veterans.
Some clues about the couple’s mindset were revealed earlier last month when Gabrielian told the agent about a 1986 book she instructed Henry to read. It describes the recruitment and training of a Soviet-era Russian spy. “It’s the mentality of sacrificing everything ... and loyalty in you from day one. That’s not something you walked away from.”
The indictment was handed up Wednesday and unsealed Thursday. The pair are charged with conspiracy and wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean she's not wrong about that part, she's wrong because she violated HIPAA. Big tech corporations help our geopolitical adversaries all the time: just look at how 90% of Silicon Valley refuses to accept military contracts (yet they'll cheerfully accept contracts with Chinese companies partnered up with the CCP).
If something is acceptable for a silicon valley corporation to do, it's totally acceptable for a private individual to do also. A two-tiered justice system has no legitimacy and if wealthy CEOs and corporations are allowed to play by different rules as middle class individual citizens then it is the duty of every patriot to overthrow the goverment and replace it with a more egalitarian one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You absolutely can't decide to share military information, by yourself, with another state, even if they are our ally. That's fricking r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't say anything specific about military information, I just said it's currently OK to help Russia (without sharing classified information) because we're not technically at war with them, and if Silicon Valley CEOs are allowed to help China (which they do all the time), then helping Russia is equally fair game also. I'm sorry if that was unclear: I'm not always the best communicator.
I think that America has completely botched diplomatic ties with Russia, and missed a potential opportunity to turn an enemy into an ally. It's especially hypocritical because China is our biggest geopolitical threat (and recently caused a pandemic which killed five million people because of illegal gain-of-function research prohibited by the Geneva convention), but because many of our politicians are too gutless to take China on (for fear that they will lose such a conflict, and suffer a humiliating loss of face) they attack Russia instead, because that's a conflict which is winnable. Like all bullies, many of our politicians are cowards at heart: they fight the little kid because the big kid is too scary for them. I'm not alone in this belief: a lot of people in this country feel the same way I do.
But regardless of whether I'm right or wrong, the point is that people have a right to advocate for their political views. Is that unreasonable? Like it's totally insane to me that Silicon Valley CEOs are allowed to do business with China after they killed five million people with illegal bioweapons less than two years ago and nobody says shit about it, but if I say maybe Russia isn't as bad as the Left believes and this whole war wouldn't have happened if people had listened to ME instead of the idiots setting national policy, suddenly I'm the bad guy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm not reading passed your first sentence lol
She was specifically and knowingly helping Russia by giving them military information that would help them with further espionage.
Any other thoughts of yours are irrelevant.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would you do it if I used shorter words?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, but a coherent string of thoughts might help.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm smart
Our leaders are stupid
Their frick-ups cost lives
Kill them and put me in charge
Thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context