Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A tragedy to be sure

https://i.rdrama.net/images/171333959028496.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17133395924458952.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17133395932110882.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Uhoh

The title is misleading. Child sexual offenders could be stripped of parental rights. It's not illegal to be a p-dophile. It's illegal to act on the urges. If we could do a better job of communicating that distinction we'd be able to get p-dophiles into treatment before they offend. But I see that's never going to happen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This affects trans people the most! !transphobes what have you done!?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love how trans people have more "Rights" than straights, that's why they're oppressed.

These idiots can't understand that we all have the same rights lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Terf Island proving again how fascist they are

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If a p-do is strictly into boys it should be fine for him to have custody of his daughter. CMV.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Daughter has friends who are boys.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Boys and girls can't be just friends. Those boys are trying to frick his daughter, so him fricking them is karma.

Next.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyschizowall:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If a p-do is into boys he probably doesn't have a daughter.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If a p-do parent is strictly into boys, he hasn't been caught raping his daughter yet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait, they're not already? What the frick?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Judges have a lot of leeway in deciding whether someone is a threat to their kids. Even this amendment only covers people who've had s*x with a kid under 13 - bone a 14 year old when you're 20 and you'll still be potentially fit to be a parent. Is that reasonable? idk

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Truly anglo perfidy, in Germany they give you more children.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@X is a p-dophile? :marseyscream:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfuckyou:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was Snappy not me :marseygiveup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What are the odds of this applying to muslims?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's their culture BIGOT

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good!!!! They should also be put on an island

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17133783985430934.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.