Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait, they're not already? What the frick?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Judges have a lot of leeway in deciding whether someone is a threat to their kids. Even this amendment only covers people who've had s*x with a kid under 13 - bone a 14 year old when you're 20 and you'll still be potentially fit to be a parent. Is that reasonable? idk

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.