He was having sexts with a libertarian who was sending him images of seven year old boys being fricked
What's weird tho is like the BBC and other news sites seem to be ambigious on whether he wanted to see the underage stuff or not is the strangest part: they say his charge can be just given to him merely being sent images and they say in DMs he told him not to send anything illegal
But like why would he see a guy sending r*pe images and just ignore it? Why did he plead guilty? It's a bizarre situation and he's definitely a libertarian imo but the articles arent explaining this "creating images" law well at all because he apparently didnt film any of these images
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did anyone report on what he actually did? There's varying levels of evil depending on if he's collecting pics of a 17 year old or a 7 year old.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He was having sexts with a libertarian who was sending him images of seven year old boys being fricked
What's weird tho is like the BBC and other news sites seem to be ambigious on whether he wanted to see the underage stuff or not is the strangest part: they say his charge can be just given to him merely being sent images and they say in DMs he told him not to send anything illegal
But like why would he see a guy sending r*pe images and just ignore it? Why did he plead guilty? It's a bizarre situation and he's definitely a libertarian imo but the articles arent explaining this "creating images" law well at all because he apparently didnt film any of these images
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context