Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did anyone report on what he actually did? There's varying levels of evil depending on if he's collecting pics of a 17 year old or a 7 year old.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was having sexts with a libertarian who was sending him images of seven year old boys being fricked

What's weird tho is like the BBC and other news sites seem to be ambigious on whether he wanted to see the underage stuff or not is the strangest part: they say his charge can be just given to him merely being sent images and they say in DMs he told him not to send anything illegal

But like why would he see a guy sending r*pe images and just ignore it? Why did he plead guilty? It's a bizarre situation and he's definitely a libertarian imo but the articles arent explaining this "creating images" law well at all because he apparently didnt film any of these images

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.