Unable to load image

3 years after decriminalizing hard drugs in Oregon, only 85 cited people sought addiction assessment—thousands died of overdose :marseypikachu2:

https://archive.is/GGGBP

@911roofer

The state of Oregon's failed experiment to decriminalize hard drugs comes to an official end on Sunday, and data from the state's judicial department reveals just how disastrous and ineffective Measure 110 was. Only 85 people issued citations sought addiction assessment during the three years of decriminalization, and thousands died from overdoses, data shows.

Oregon became the first state in the nation to decriminalize possession of illicit drugs - such as heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, and LSD - when voters approved Ballot Measure 110 in Nov. 2020. The law took effect on Feb. 1, 2021, turning possession of hard drugs from a criminal misdemeanor into a Class E misdemeanor, which warrants a citation of up to $100. The punishment could be compared to receiving a traffic ticket.

Measure 110 citations had granted those in possession of illegal drugs two options: pay a $100 fine through the court system or call a substance abuse helpline in exchange for their citation being waived. Progressive lawmakers intended to use cannabis tax income to fund the state's treatment system to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, but data shows hardly anyone paid the fine or called the helpline.

In March, state lawmakers voted to recriminalize drug possession after their effort at decriminalization resulted in heavy open-air drug use and a significant surge in overdose deaths. Oregon legislators hailed the measure as an approach to addiction, but in return, decriminalization was a hard lesson learned.

The Oregon Judicial Department released circuit court data from Feb. 2021 to Aug. 2024, which was published by the Oregonian. It revealed that out of the $899,413 fines issued under the measure across all circuit courts, the state only collected $78,143.

Officers cited 7,227 people under Measure 110 statewide, and 89 percent of them were convicted. However, nearly all convictions were because people skipped their court dates. Out of the 7,227 people cited, only 85 of them completed their substance abuse screening through the helpline, which was needed in order to have the citation dropped.

The report revealed that 54 percent of citations were for methamphetamine, 31 percent were for fentanyl and other Schedule II drugs, 7 percent were for heroin, 3 percent were for oxycodone, and 1 percent were for cocaine, per the data.

In Multnomah County, which encompasses the state's largest city impacted by drug abuse, Portland, police issued 1,917 Measure 110 citations. The conviction rate was 93 percent because of failure to appear in court. Only 16 people in the county called the helpline to complete the substance abuse screening.

The most citations (2,036) were issued by the Medford Police Department, of which 1,236 were linked to methamphetamine. Oregon State Police issued 1,756 citations, the Grants Pass Police Department issued 1,642 citations, and the Portland Police Bureau issued 1,332 citations. Other law enforcement agencies across the state issued either a dozen or just one, according to the Judicial Department.

Between 2021, when the bill took effect, and 2023, the most current year for statistics, 3,086 people died from opioid overdoses. The Oregon Health Authority noted that "The number of opioid overdose visits to [emergency departments] and [urgent care centers] in 2024 are similar to 2023."

50
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What if you had to, like, get a drug permit to buy drugs or something


https://media.tenor.com/ijjvLg8vm3cAAAAx/donkey-kong-punch.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My brilliant idea is to have it marked on your driver's license whether you're allowed to buy alcohol or not. That way the court could take away the right from people who commit alcohol-related crimes. Or alcoholics who wanted to quit could get theirs revoked voluntarily. Of course it wouldn't be impossible for them to get someone else to buy it for them, but it would greatly reduce the amount of impulsively getting a lot of liquor and immediately getting wasted and doing something stupid.

Instead we just put people on probation and tell them they're not allowed to drink but there's no way to enforce that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagree: This would have disparate racial impacts so we can't do that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyagree:

Now how to actually implement that law? :marseyhmm:


https://media.tenor.com/ijjvLg8vm3cAAAAx/donkey-kong-punch.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Stickerbrush Symphony (Ori and the Will of the Wisps Remix) (DKC2).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.