“When hundreds of experts in multiple surveys put a man in strong contention for the title of the Worst President in the Nation’s History, it says something about our respect for expertise that we decided to give the man another go,” Rachel Maddow writes. https://t.co/kepv1FMUXh
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) November 11, 2024
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
6. Be nice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The modern left certainly loves their "experts". They really despise people coming to their own conclusions for some reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When the Leftoid says "expert" he basically means "priest." They certainly aren't talking about scientists doing actual science that can be peer reviewed and verified.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's the perfect example of their use of the word "experts" too. Is there anything rigorous or scientific about president ranking "experts"? Do they make accurate predictions that have any value or utility, for instance? Are their opinions like "Orange man reminds me of Hitler" falsifiable?
Actually, that reminds me of something that I heard about some years ago. I probably will get the details wrong. But someone actually did make an attempt at studying the appeal of presidential candidates. They took Trump and Hillary speeches and tested them out with different speakers/genders delivering them to see how much impact it made.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah I remember there was a video of it on YouTube. They had actors to mirror mannerisms and everything. It was looking at the supposed role of sexism and people hated dude Hillary too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Eye-opening, reminds me of all the Dem women in my family who liked Nikki Haley for
having a vaginasome reason they could never explain.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I agree but at the same time cringe when people bring their kids into my clinic and tell me they don't want X vaccine because they did their own research
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
So leftoids are on the cusp of creating 'who to vote for president' experts and if you vote the wrong way you're a science denier?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
hundreds of experts, huh?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Says something about that man's opponent too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://x.com/NewYorker/status/1855992794092847249:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Linked on Twitter because otherwise no one will ever see it otherwise.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context