Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it's evidence that the folks at the National Archives are incompetent at technology that could do this, likely at a higher standard than volunteers. USPS achieved it for something like 99.99% of handwritten addresses, even in cursive.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:lies:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They had already hit a 98% rate for handwritten addresses (and 99.5% of machine written) over 10 years ago. I'm having trouble finding a more recent source for the current rate.

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/04/us/where-mail-with-illegible-addresses-goes-to-be-read.html

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1736812345kZv6MUREf3H3hw.webp

I can't hear you..

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/o9nkToQTFg8AAAAx/listen-adam.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Da Banana Bunch (DK64).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.