https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1irm6td/what_happens_when_everyone_decides_they_need_a_gun/
Top Poster of the Day:
JimieWhales
Current Registered Users: 31,087
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
6. Be nice.
/h/mnn SETTINGS /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn LOG /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
/u/surreptitioussloth
Let's be generous and multiply the death
count by 10 to account for injuries not resulting in death. And let's just assume the data for background checks passed all resulted in the purchase of a gun even though the actual number 
of gun owners is certainly much higher. This gives us 0.00857813% of gun owners being responsible for accidental harm.
An absolutely r-slurred
subzero IQ take. Keep yourself 
safe.
/u/xX_Negative_Won_Xx
Guns are for protecting yourself
from brutes who are trying to physically harm you. Not for when you lose your job as a replaceable wagie. Another hole-brained redditor 
from that MRI thread 
strikes again.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
rookienumbers.mp4
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's partially right, at least. I don't have guns to fight the military though, they're for when violent leftoids decide they're either going to try and take my shit or otherwise frick with it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based on recent conflicts, the US military seems especially unable to handle random dudes with rifles and pickup trucks if they persist long enough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's what these dorks don't get. It ain't gonna be a war with clear fronts and 2 sides. It's gonna be Jerry and his boy building a pipe bomb for the nearby power substation, it'll be mary two blocks away planning on shooting the mayor, it's Richard sneaking up on a parked patrol car that's what a civilian uprising against the government will look like. Jets and tanks and satellite technology won't help if you can't tell which houses hold dissents and loyalists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If it really did get so out of hand where most of the country actually sympathizes with an uprising, it would crumble military infrastructure. Eventually they'd face shortages of ammo, parts, and personnel. Most of the damage to the military wouldn't come from combat, as they'd probably win most direct engagements, but rather the steep decline of the American productivity that sustains them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Throughout human history, the #1 danger to females always has been males of every variant. The venom, the threats of violence by XY and the never ending attempts to silence endless number of women who dare stand up for themselves and other females is staggering but not surprising. Right of girls and women are not to be subsumed by XY pretending to be XX.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1irm6td/what_happens_when_everyone_decides_they_need_a_gun/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context