I mean, yeah. That was weird. Lying in the bed as if they're the ones who gave birth? I have a lot of problems with commercial surrogacy, and this sums them all up: erasing the reality that a woman is the mother of these children, who will never be involved in their lives or credited with being the biological parent. Two women, maybe, if they had separate egg donor and surrogate for the pregnancy.
And okay, women enter into this as a commercial transaction and don't see the babies as their kids, that's fine. But trying so hard to pretend that what you are doing is normal and equivalent to straight couples who get married and have kids, that you construct an image where you are both simultaneously the mother and the father? That's not normal, guys.
Not pictured one bed over: the woman who just suffered through labour and looks like hot exhausted garbage.
I don't even oppose surrogacy (in Aus it has to be altrusitic which is to say it's less transactional / buy a baby) but I DO oppose the weird photoshoot of the gay dudes sitting in a hospital bed as if they actually gave birth. There are dad chairs there that you can sit in and hold your kid without the creepy larp.
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He wants to deflect from how wierd his surragacy was. And how the hospital photo shoot he did was even weirder.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think the Pope has reasonable objections to surrogacy. Paying mothers to give their baby to a gay couple.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
is he also opposed to adoption?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean, yeah. That was weird. Lying in the bed as if they're the ones who gave birth? I have a lot of problems with commercial surrogacy, and this sums them all up: erasing the reality that a woman is the mother of these children, who will never be involved in their lives or credited with being the biological parent. Two women, maybe, if they had separate egg donor and surrogate for the pregnancy.
And okay, women enter into this as a commercial transaction and don't see the babies as their kids, that's fine. But trying so hard to pretend that what you are doing is normal and equivalent to straight couples who get married and have kids, that you construct an image where you are both simultaneously the mother and the father? That's not normal, guys.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not pictured one bed over: the woman who just suffered through labour and looks like hot exhausted garbage.
I don't even oppose surrogacy (in Aus it has to be altrusitic which is to say it's less transactional / buy a baby) but I DO oppose the weird photoshoot of the gay dudes sitting in a hospital bed as if they actually gave birth. There are dad chairs there that you can sit in and hold your kid without the creepy larp.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context