https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/12/saudi-arabia-executes-81-people-in-a-single-day
Reported by:
- PoopNxggaHitler69studios : R/justiceserved
- BasedGod : r/prorevenge r/instantKarma r/wahabbisbemyhead r/humanrightspassdenied r/givinghead(NSFW)
- JoeBiden : Gta 5 was such a good game bros. It wasnt even that fun, i just miss 2013
Saudi Arabia executes 81 people in a single day
- 81
- 106
Top Poster of the Day:
.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,720
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and
@Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
6. Be nice.
/h/mnn SETTINGS /h/mnn LOG /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Current software version: c889144
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is it bad that I don’t think public beheadings for serious crime is a bad thing? But it should also be done to pol*ticians.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We need some of that here in Australia, the fricking abbos are out of control, especially the kids that know they can't be locked up under current legislation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It is a bad thing
but so is serious crime
putting the heads on spikes in high crime areas would probably reduce crime quite a bit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe if you live in Northumbria.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I’m a keen believer in three strikes. Doesn’t matter what it is - shoplifting, arson, double parking - you frick up three times and then you get the chop chop.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Drama users once again proving that they're just as r-slurred as the redditors they mock
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'll have you know I am proud of my mental r-sluration
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If I ran society shit would be great.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It’s not the same. Have an upmarsey.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Have a downmarsey frick
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Based and Foucault-pilled
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
weird that a nonce would advocate for public displays of torture
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just not a prison made of mirrors. The French can’t bare to look at themselves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't think that's a fair representation.
Gotta remember, whilst they enact the worst of his theoretical propositions, the academic left actually hate Foucault's politics as neoliberal
A true Dramatard, something for everyone to hate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
There's no actual argument for a government that has the infrastructure to permanently imprison people to employ the death penalty outside of emotional ones. We have an imperfect justice system and any system with a death penalty will inevitably kill innocent people. Life sentences can at least be reversed.
It doesn't deter crime. It isn't less expensive. It doesn't make society safer. It just provides more room for error.
"But what about the victims families???" I'm sure they would like to see the perpetrator tortured to death to, but we've already decided that there's a line to how much punishment they can demand. Life in a concrete box is far more of a punishment than a quick death anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Weak and gay.
Then why do so many people make plea deals to get life without parole in lieu of the death penalty? Everyone serving life in prison today is one twisted up bedsheet away from the abyss, why do most of them choose life?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because not wanting to die is a human impulse, and it's easier to be afraid of immediate death than to comprehend the suffering over 50 years of imprisonment.
Sorry the right answer takes longer to explain than your poorly thought out bullshit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That’s a lot of words to say “I’m a weak gay r-slur”.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Takes one to know one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pol Pot was able to afford it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't understand why people use the execution of innocent people as an argument against death penalty.
The point of death penalty is to set an example and scare everyone straight out of committing any more crimes. Killing innocent people has just as much of a scare factor as killing criminals - if not moreso.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is why Duerte goes around killing innocent families - to scare competitor drug dealers from his son's market.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
statistical value of a human life (high estimate): $5M
(this can be estimated in various ways by observing how much effort/resources/money people are willing to expend in order to marginally reduce their risk of death, or how much risk they're willing to take in exchange for rewards/money. E.g. gang members and drug addicts value their own lives far lower than other people do.)
cost of imprisoning someone per year: $50k
Consider a prisoner whose crime would warrant execution or life imprisonment. Define:
probability that the prisoner is innocent: P(innocent)
remaining life expectation of prisoner: E(life)
If E(life) * $50k > P(innocent) * $5M, execution should be preferred over life imprisonment.
This is equivalent to:
P(innocent) < E(life) / 100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unless you're ok with someone paying a 5 million dollar fine for killing someone then this is a stupid argument.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's more about how much you value your own life, e.g. how much money does someone have to give you to do something that carries a 0.1% risk of death? Then multiply that by 1000.
When someone murders you, they do so without your consent.
But when you commit a crime that is punishable by death, you decide to take that risk (die if you get caught and convicted). It's your own decision in a way.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Not being an butt but you got the legit proofs for this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Not a bad thing, but stupid to trust your government with that power.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context