Unable to load image

Harvard cancels geo-engineering experiment because it might have solved global warming without needing a planetwide leftist revolution

https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/18/1089879/harvard-halts-its-long-planned-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiment/

But critics argue that even studying the possibility of solar geoengineering eases the societal pressure to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

127
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Net zero by 2050 is a fantasy but filling the stratosphere with sulfur might not be the brightest idea (I think they'll eventually do it regardless). Banning research on it is super r-slurred though, how else will we know whether it could work.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's already been done for the last few decades. Stratospheric aersol injection

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes and we stopped it because it caused acidic rain and eroded the Ozone layer, and that wasn't even on the scale necessary to cool the planet 1.5 °C

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

because they plan on releasing foxDie as the particulate matter, so it doesnt matter if we research whether sodium carbonate works or not

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseypuni#shed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.