/r/climatechange continues to attract r-slurs from /r/collapse which is sad because I don't think there's any serious sub to discuss climate change and it's effects on a rational way. The problem is not that climate change is not problem, a 2.5-3C (the scenario we're currently heading) rise above pre industrial levels until 2100 will be dreadful as impacts in agriculture will cause food insecurity in many countries.
The problem is collapsecels taking the most over the top non-scientific claims and presenting them as truth
I think quality of life is going to crash over the next 100 years and long term survival of the human race is 50/50.
Some
Some say that the warming in the pipeline is enough to send humanity off the proverbial cliff even if we stop all emissions tomorrow. And I'm talking full blown extinction. Frankly, seeing as how it's much easier to stick a wrench in a motor and blow it all apart than it is to build the motor, I think that's absolutely the case. We've stuck a wrench in the carbon cycle and there's no unsticking except MAYBE with miracle level tech like a room temp superconductor. Really want to be proven wrong.
Now this guy is talking about runaway greenhouse effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runaway_greenhouse_effect
Which no respectable climate scientist claims will happen even in worst case scenarios.
I would not be shocked if by 2030 we're looking into the abyss, so to speak. Climate wise, the 20s may be the last “good” decade for our species.
Some bonus
https://old.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/1bjv3lq/rising_ocean_temperature/
I'm more concerned with rising ocean temperatures and the effect that would have on the primary source of oxygen. Phytoplankton, what impact will that have because if they go thats it, everything goes. We can exist without sea life, people will miss seafood food but it wouldn't be the end. Lack of oxygen, definitely the end.
Again with the “Phytoplankton is going extinct! We'll suffocate!”, something doubtful even taking ocean acidification in account. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28391-oceans-hidden-green-plankton-revealed-by-fixing-glitch-in-model/
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/peril-and-promise/2022/07/atlantic-oceans-plankton/
Even if that marine doomsday scenario happened plants would still produce oxygen, and even if all photosynthesis magically stoped it would take millions of years for oxygen to vanish from our atmosphere, that's the type of ridiculous scenario they take as truth along with the “we'll turn into Venus”.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Climate science" is just taking the temperature change from the last 3 years and using it to cause inaccurate predictions such as:
Global desertification (alla Mad max)/global iceage (alla Snowpiercer) no inbetween
Global famine, pestilence, armageddon
Total societal collapse, extinction of all life on Earth
Obviously if the temperature average raises 1degree each year for the next 75 years we are doomed. It's all human's fault. So we need to:
Stop using fossil fuels globally.
Limiting our electricity usage to 1kW a week. ASAP.
Cannibalize each other to save resources. Yt people first of course.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's a schizo in one of my group chats who CONSTANTLY posts about computers power use and refuses to learn the difference.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d028/7d02851f4f3d2b5cdf2a19ba815ae4c3c24af502" alt=":marseyfluffyannoyed: :marseyfluffyannoyed:"
His crowning achievement was reducing the performance of a CPU he paid extra for to save $30 over the entire year
- his measurements of course assumed everything was constant and the computer didn't…dynamically change frequency?? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d04e/8d04e2fd8145b964c9d5bd1be0e93f78bbaaa73e" alt=":marseyfacepalm: :marseyfacepalm:"
!codecels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Start arguing with him that by reducing the performance, it takes the computer longer to perform a task and so it ends up using more energy in the end
Like congrats neighbor you underclocked your desktop to laptop performance levels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He won't have it lol. Type of nerd who loves to argue but never read what you're writing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
that seems wrong. Read the first paragraph from the relevant wikipedia section
Assuming equal hardware, underclocking + undervolting will increase efficiency, especially when cpu isn't your bottleneck
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is he also into crypto and very defensive when told hes r-slurred?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no that's medata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7395/c739571cbe53f8f0a8c0aeac240c94cfcc24144d" alt=":marseyretardchad: :marseyretardchad:"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Next ritalin is on medata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28a8d/28a8dc11f6da66926ea984864845f75e75361c53" alt=":marseyheart: :marseyheart:"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I already took
@RitalinRx9 ;)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context