Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the superhero as a fascist archetype stems from real life political conversations in superhero storytelling [and also] in the fundamental premise that an empowered individual should have any kind of authority to punish evildoers whatsoever

So they're fascist archetypes because of what they say (which is what exactly? *crickets*) and because of their vigilantism.

Fascism is a system of government. Vigilantism operates outside of any system of government. Superheroes are archetypes of a vigilante. That's it. Otherwise, we could conclude that superheroes are an archetype of communists.

Granted, commies and fascists have operated outside of the law to right wrongs as they perceive, but their reasons are different. Same goes for superheroes who are basically like "I don't like actual criminals as defined by a basic set of laws against stealing, killing, or cheating people." Communists and fascists have a bit of that but also expand their definition of criminal into "people who do as they please with their property regardless of them actually stealing, killing, or cheating people out of their just deserts."

There's a lot of superhero stories where they form a "league of justice," but that's centered on combating "the bad guys." They impose a rule of law against a group of clearly defined Bad Guys. Still completely different from communists and fascists' definitions of Bad Guys (which is everyone who is not in their Party).

The superhero archetype also varies from representing the sole and morally good vigilante (Batman) to a group of "vigilantes" who impose their own rule of law on certain people (justice league).

Still no fascist or communist archetype at play here. :marseyshrug: Could it be that these r-slurs do not understand the differences of moral rules among those governments and vigilantes? :marseyhmm:

!mottezans, discuss!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the superhero as a fascist archetype stems from real life political conversations in superhero storytelling [and also] in the fundamental premise that an empowered individual should have any kind of authority to punish evildoers whatsoever

>person gets power to stop crime

>uses it to stop crime

FASCIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :#soytantrumglow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They hate both because both are related to masculinity, and masculinity makes bitter, insecure foids and sissy campy degenerates mad.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And modern western leftism espouses weakness and victimhood as being a virtue.

They see the superhero as playing the same role as a cop in their discourse. He is a tool and boot of the state to suppress and punish those who have been forgotten and exploited by capitalism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Doesn't even make sense considering the more fantastical supervillains. In what way has capitalism oppressed Thanos or Ares the God of War? :marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It doesn't make sense because almost no one espouses those views lol, it's just a dumb strawman,

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Imagine knowing actual examples of comic book characters. :marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyaware:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Uncle Ted is right about leftards.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Must it always come down to s*x?

:marseyfreud:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not necessary related to s*x, at least that's not why bitter and insecure foids hate masculinity, or even the latter.

They hate strong-willed people, and see being weak as a virtue.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ohhh.

Hi, Uncle Ted! :marseywave3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everything is about s*x, except s*x. S*x is about power. :marseyreading:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

[–]LazyDro1d 76 points 8 hours ago

I also don't think any of the actions described are fascist though. Brutal and utilitarian/authoritarian (first is utilitarian second is authoritarian) maybe, fascism is NOT THE SAME AS THOSE

[–]SEA_griffondeur 36 points 5 hours ago

Yeah if people want to know what textbook fascism is with a superhero, look at homelander

The first gets part of it right. He's the most highly upmarseyd redditor who comes close to being correct, but he's missing the whole part about vigilantism, which is what superheroes are. :marseyfacepalm:

The second one is clearly brain-damaged and just as vague as the same point that was made in the OP: [superheroes have political conversations that are somehow fascist; therefore, they're fascist]. He's fascist because he is! :marseyindignant!:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Homelander is making fun of Superman, does this guy not realize that the point of Homelander is not "what if Superman was fascist" it's an accusation: "Superman IS fascist!"

Like i dont agree with the critique but the inherent point of the character isnt to say "well theres some bad apples in the superhero genre"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you dont understand immediately how <\ libshit approved bad guy> is blatantly fascist, it just proves that you are a fascist sealioning bad faith questions :#chadleftoid:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Exactly they're mainly anonymous vigilantes, Batman isn't using his power to become a strongman leader of America

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Superheroes are communists though?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.