TRres/pect
no second Troy
R 4mo ago#6681280
spent 0 currency on pings
Current: anyone who makes a commie upset
The OG italian movement was pretty interesting and worth reading about. Fascism has been literally dead and burried for over 60 years by now so anyone who mentions it in a current setting is a hysterical lib
I think Atlas Shrugged could have been a cool sci Fi book with John galt as more of a sympathetic supervillain kind of guy who is kidnapping as many people as he's convincing to join. It could have even kept a similar message, made lots of the people Dagny is trying to save, even the poors, really shitty and greedy.
I slogged through The Fountainhead which was supposed to be her best and most accessible novel.
It was so fricking stupid. I'm a civil engineer and if I had worked on the construction of the building Roark blew-up I would have wanted him to be executed, on the other hand some architects can be so defensive and self-absorbed I can imagine them applauding that terrorist as some brave artist so maybe Rand didn't get it all wrong.
1. Superheroes are the idealized version of Great Men inherent in Fascistic ideology, that demokkkracy can't solve anything and only leads to ruination and degeneracy while a vigilante, reigning justice from above, able to overcome and rip through all the hurdles that bind normal soyciety can lift the curse from the people single-handedly. Example - literally Hitler
2. Superheroes are the idealized version of humanity. That the nameless and faceless amogus work tirelessly even in the face of fascistic threats, actual journos reporting under a dictatorship even at the threat of their lives, revolutionaries willing to give their life for their ideals and rouse the spirits of the enslaved to show what they can achieve. They defeat regimes by showing the people that victory can be achieved, even at their death. Example - Nathan Hale, The Scholl siblings and literally Jesus
People will believe what they want.
!bookworms which stream of philosophy do you subscribe to?
Superheroes are fictional stories made for children and youngsters and other people to hace fun and maybe look as a model. Nothing more.
They're not different from medieval chivalrous romances as even though as those had masterpieces like Chanson de Roland and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, by the 16th and 17th century it was mostly slop which is why Miguel de Cervantes mocked them in Don Quixote.
Leftoids are so brainrotted by marxism that they believe history began in 1789 and keep throwing their shitty theory at everything.
NightcrawlerX/Man
Those whom I love, I reprove and chasten; so be zealous and repent.
nuclearshill 4mo ago#6679938
spent 0 currency on pings
Jung disagrees but I've never met someone who promoted Jung without seeming like a total pseud. One of the biggest online Orthobros was doing it before Peterson got popular.
Quoting Jung and Freud in modern day is so weird. Not only are their theories outdated/proven false but even back on the day at least Freud was kind of seen as a quack by many, I imagine it wouldn't be much different with Jung though he was as much as a crackpot as Freud.
I'm not comparing superhero stories to fascism. That's the job best left to ham fisted liberals who are too kitty to say "both sides bad" but make every effort to distinguish themselves from tankies and end up making "anti-slop"slop like The Boys and Homelander shit
I'm talking about the idea of Great Men acting as the propellant of history.
That Great men are the prime movers of history is begrudgingly accepted by even the most "proleteriat" of historians. No movement, no ideal, no belief can survive without having a persona attached to them. This serves two purpose - 1. To make people share their pain as their own pain, their gain as their own happiness. It binds you closely to the ideals. Christ's pain is your pain. Christ died for your sins.
And on the opposite side- 2. Discarding these ideals when they are found to be anachronistic are made easier. It's much less cumbersome to say McCarthy was bad than say the idea of widespread surveillance to keep socialism at bay was bad because it's too amorphous to describe why actually showing pity to the poor is detrimental to US interests (literally a question McCarthy had put in citizenship applications in the 50s which remained long after he was gone).
Hope I got my point across. I can't put in so much effort only to get laughed at by longpostbot.
How are great men inherent to fascism? Isn't the whole point of fascism the ablaton of the individual in the service of the state/race? Isn't viglantism, a rejection of the states monopoly on legitimate proactive violence and a willingness to follow ones own moral code, antithetical to a extreme worship of tradition, the state, the military like fascism? The hero of fascism isn't the vigilante, it's the soldier. Number 1. sounds more like an ubermensch, a post moral hero striding past egalitarian untermench to create their own version of heaven on earth.
Great men aren't inherent to fascism. Like I said, you can interpret it in both ways. Great men as transcending the social barriers of their time is the prerequisite of transforming into a superhero. The process of transformation and their rhetoric and sermons to people while they erupt from the cocoon of mid to great is what determines whether they are fascist or shining beacons of humanity.
Rhetoric 1 is of fascists - "only they" can make you better. Everything is better with them.
Rhetoric 2 of humanitarians - they will risk/sacrifice themselves for "the truth". For truth is the only ideal that matters. (I'm going on a very Socratic bend here, but it's my interpretation).
If you believe in both rhetorics, you come to a twilight zone where, indeed we are living in a post truth society, because dems' pursuit of putting ideological tints over every news is no less than republicans and both are equally fascistic. Which is why we see these ugly pointless culture wars about Marvel superheroes because both sides want to appropriate fascistic icons for themselves.
Great Man theory is a meme and an evolution to the even more idiotic Great God theory. Only historical materialism provides a decent, scientific understanding of history and social evolution and it is to this day the best attempt humanity has ever given to a proper theory of history.
I don't wanna beat a dead horse but Hegel and the idealists have already been thoroughly trounced over 150 years ago while dialectical materialism still reigns supreme, so I choose option 3, read The Society of the Spectacle.
Alan moore is high quality he writes more then superhero stuff. Plus if you are willing to read sci fi and fantasy capes are not a huge slumming expirence Read From Heck or if you really hate comics read Jerusalem which is a great novel !comicshitters Do not let this man slander Mister Moore
I honestly read Watchmen after reading the Boys and couldn't take the thing seriously because I constantly felt like it was on the verge of revealing Nite Owl owned some kind of Epstein-Island tier p-do r*pe pit and that the big reveal'd be that Doctor Manhattan was raping everyone with his massive blue peepee at all times, and was the true mastermind behind everything
EvilUbiecute/twink 4mo ago#6679677
Edited 4mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
the superhero as a fascist archetype stems from real life political conversations in superhero storytelling [and also] in the fundamental premise that an empowered individual should have any kind of authority to punish evildoers whatsoever
So they're fascist archetypes because of what they say (which is what exactly? *crickets*) and because of their vigilantism.
Fascism is a system of government. Vigilantism operates outside of any system of government. Superheroes are archetypes of a vigilante. That's it. Otherwise, we could conclude that superheroes are an archetype of communists.
Granted, commies and fascists have operated outside of the law to right wrongs as they perceive, but their reasons are different. Same goes for superheroes who are basically like "I don't like actual criminals as defined by a basic set of laws against stealing, killing, or cheating people." Communists and fascists have a bit of that but also expand their definition of criminal into "people who do as they please with their property regardless of them actually stealing, killing, or cheating people out of their just deserts."
There's a lot of superhero stories where they form a "league of justice," but that's centered on combating "the bad guys." They impose a rule of law against a group of clearly defined Bad Guys. Still completely different from communists and fascists' definitions of Bad Guys (which is everyone who is not in their Party).
The superhero archetype also varies from representing the sole and morally good vigilante (Batman) to a group of "vigilantes" who impose their own rule of law on certain people (justice league).
Still no fascist or communist archetype at play here. Could it be that these r-slurs do not understand the differences of moral rules among those governments and vigilantes?
And modern western leftism espouses weakness and victimhood as being a virtue.
They see the superhero as playing the same role as a cop in their discourse. He is a tool and boot of the state to suppress and punish those who have been forgotten and exploited by capitalism.
I also don't think any of the actions described are fascist though. Brutal and utilitarian/authoritarian (first is utilitarian second is authoritarian) maybe, fascism is NOT THE SAME AS THOSE
[–]SEA_griffondeur 36 points 5 hours ago
Yeah if people want to know what textbook fascism is with a superhero, look at homelander
The first gets part of it right. He's the most highly upmarseyd redditor who comes close to being correct, but he's missing the whole part about vigilantism, which is what superheroes are.
The second one is clearly brain-damaged and just as vague as the same point that was made in the OP: [superheroes have political conversations that are somehow fascist; therefore, they're fascist]. He's fascist because he is!
Homelander is making fun of Superman, does this guy not realize that the point of Homelander is not "what if Superman was fascist" it's an accusation: "Superman IS fascist!"
Like i dont agree with the critique but the inherent point of the character isnt to say "well theres some bad apples in the superhero genre"
AdventUsDominiArrive/Lord
Born in a barn not a factory hall. Really makes u think
EvilUbie 4mo ago#6679733
spent 0 currency on pings
If you dont understand immediately how <\ libshit approved bad guy> is blatantly fascist, it just proves that you are a fascist sealioning bad faith questions
the superhero as a fascist archetype stems from real life political conversations in superhero storytelling [and also] in the fundamental premise that an empowered individual should have any kind of authority to punish evildoers whatsoever
Wasn't the very concept of superheroes made by liberal jews modernizing the trope of the Golem?
Also I thought every good work ever made was made by liberals and chuds are invader parasites that never made anything
ALSO "Grrr people are making something I don't like" chuddery is rampant I see
ALSO^3 "Superheroes are bad because they deliver extrajudicial violent "justice"" but I could bet my spleen they worship Antifa "super soldiers", curious
Don't worry, the user above you somehow thinks being working-class and Jewish is impossible as was the case for the creators of Superman, Batman, Green Lantern, Captain America, etc
This is a complete strawman, Stan Lee is Jewish and wrote the dialogue of the Spiderman stories whereas Ditko did the drawings, as well as writing Captain America and other stories up until the 70s where other libs like Gerry Conway took over. The idea that there was "Americaman" and "Blue Justice" is ridiculous, the anti-communist and patriotic allegories came because they were made when people needed a morale boost during the literal WW2 and cold wars with the soviets where communists were actual dictators and not your son's weird friends. Even then, the "anti-communist" era of Captain America was so brief that Marvel apologized for it and retconned it to be a right wing nutjob who stole the name
Another thing is like these comics tackling issues like drug crime were created because people demanded that comics comment on these political issues that were seriously affecting the populace. Stan Lee and Gerry Conway used Harry's drug addiction to call out Norman, an old rich white businessman, for only caring about it when it got out of the hood
This regurgitated Moore shit is regarded when you realize hes an anarchist that was a part of vigilante antifa groups. Also what is the state but anonymous men with enormous amountsh of power?
And to the argument of "well the idea of a superpowered individual having the authority to punish evildoers is fascistic" well good thing they collaborate with police then :)
But my other argument against all this is this: theyre not real
Not to be a nerd but Rorschach is based off two of Ditko's characters, the more famous Question and Mr. A, both Objectivist characters created by Steve Ditko. Trying to connect Randian philosophy/politics to fascistic politics seems to be their trying to put two things you don't like into the same group. Randian philosophy/politics desires for as minimal state involvement in society and for people to be as objective and rational as they can. Fascism desires for a highly centralized state governing society with high state involvement. Quite funny to see them saying that Watchmen is about "superheroes are FASCIST" when Richard Nixon has been president in the Watchmen world for at least four terms in-universe and the state using superheroes to further their goals, e.g. Dr. Manhattan ending the Vietnam War in only one month. The state is much more authoritarian than the superheroes.
Redactor0naori/oppa
The Rachel Dolezal of Maronite Christians.
4mo ago#6680353
spent 0 currency on pings
I don't know or care enough about capeshit to have much to say, but I do think it's got to be unhealthy for people to grow up with this slop being their whole culture. Which it seems to be for zoomers.
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy
4mo ago#6679561
spent 0 currency on pings
Why is it that even beyond the realm of plebbit you buttholes still feel the need to restrain yourselves from indulging in some quality drama. It's like your fricking yourselves out of habit.
But that's only part of it. Even typing the title I already knew the answer to it. The sad fact is that you bastards have somehow become so jaded, so emotionally stunted, and so nihilistic that you can't even motivate yourself to get invested in some good old r-slurred internet drama.
The culture of Arrr drama murdered itself, because you apathetic bastards stopped caring about shit so hard that you can't even get invested in something or some argument purely for the drama of it anymore. You, as a culture and a community, kept picking apart and tearing down any ideological or philosophical position, and you attacked the very idea of taking any sort of ideological position on an issue to the point where now you cant even force yourself to take the contrarian position or the position of wanting more drama out of something.
You grew to despise the idea of caring about anything so much that you can't bring yourself to care about drama.
Now arrr drama, and all it's spinoffs, have become a place for nihilists created by this place to try to give a shit, if only for the sake of drama, or for emotionally stunted narcissists to try to relive their "glory" days of bullying the weird kids in middle school by laughing at random people acting stupid on the internet, just like the plebbitor who tries to relive his childhood by sperging about capeshit on the internet.
And for those of you who will inevitably reply, "imagine caring", the point of drama is to blow everything ridiculously out of proportion, not to not give a shit whatsoever.
And one last thing. And this is real shit, not just ironic drama tardation: despite the fact that drama is inherently a sort of guilty, immoral pleasure, enjoying it doesn't need to involve being actually terrible and peepeeish. Which some of you are; seemingly prevented from giving a frick or caring about anything at all on the internet because of your irony poisoned brains that have decided that it's ok to be a sociopath as long as it's not serious while simultaneously refusing to take anything seriously.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I still don't know the correct definition of fascism, and probably never will
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Current: anyone who makes a commie upset
The OG italian movement was pretty interesting and worth reading about. Fascism has been literally dead and burried for over 60 years by now so anyone who mentions it in a current setting is a hysterical lib
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!bookworms what is wrong with these cute twinks?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fascism just means "things I don't like". When you're stupid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ayn Rand was a pseudo-philosopher and a poor writer. But I love her because of the SEETHE she still causes nowadays.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think Atlas Shrugged could have been a cool sci Fi book with John galt as more of a sympathetic supervillain kind of guy who is kidnapping as many people as he's convincing to join. It could have even kept a similar message, made lots of the people Dagny is trying to save, even the poors, really shitty and greedy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That marsey brought back memories of slogging through that fricking book
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I slogged through The Fountainhead which was supposed to be her best and most accessible novel.
It was so fricking stupid. I'm a civil engineer and if I had worked on the construction of the building Roark blew-up I would have wanted him to be executed, on the other hand some architects can be so defensive and self-absorbed I can imagine them applauding that terrorist as some brave artist so maybe Rand didn't get it all wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fricking courtroom part so bad that it's actually good lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I love her because I don't give a frick about other people, I don't want to pay taxes, but I still want Social Security when I'm older.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
1. Superheroes are the idealized version of Great Men inherent in Fascistic ideology, that demokkkracy can't solve anything and only leads to ruination and degeneracy while a vigilante, reigning justice from above, able to overcome and rip through all the hurdles that bind normal soyciety can lift the curse from the people single-handedly. Example - literally Hitler
2. Superheroes are the idealized version of humanity. That the nameless and faceless amogus work tirelessly even in the face of fascistic threats, actual journos reporting under a dictatorship even at the threat of their lives, revolutionaries willing to give their life for their ideals and rouse the spirits of the enslaved to show what they can achieve. They defeat regimes by showing the people that victory can be achieved, even at their death. Example - Nathan Hale, The Scholl siblings and literally Jesus
People will believe what they want.
!bookworms which stream of philosophy do you subscribe to?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Superheroes are fictional stories made for children and youngsters and other people to hace fun and maybe look as a model. Nothing more.
They're not different from medieval chivalrous romances as even though as those had masterpieces like Chanson de Roland and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, by the 16th and 17th century it was mostly slop which is why Miguel de Cervantes mocked them in Don Quixote.
Leftoids are so brainrotted by marxism that they believe history began in 1789 and keep throwing their shitty theory at everything.
!historychads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Glad to see you're back and just as ornery as ever.
One of my better ones
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You should flip this picture upside down and see if anyone notices
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
NOOOOOO CONFLICT THEORY IS THE ONLY WAY TO VIEW THE WORLD
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jung disagrees but I've never met someone who promoted Jung without seeming like a total pseud. One of the biggest online Orthobros was doing it before Peterson got popular.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Quoting Jung and Freud in modern day is so weird. Not only are their theories outdated/proven false but even back on the day at least Freud was kind of seen as a quack by many, I imagine it wouldn't be much different with Jung though he was as much as a crackpot as Freud.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Only the most terminally online, soy-infused "leftists" spend any amount of energy debating whether comic books are fascistic or not.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm not comparing superhero stories to fascism. That's the job best left to ham fisted liberals who are too kitty to say "both sides bad" but make every effort to distinguish themselves from tankies and end up making "anti-slop"slop like The Boys and Homelander shit
I'm talking about the idea of Great Men acting as the propellant of history.
That Great men are the prime movers of history is begrudgingly accepted by even the most "proleteriat" of historians. No movement, no ideal, no belief can survive without having a persona attached to them. This serves two purpose - 1. To make people share their pain as their own pain, their gain as their own happiness. It binds you closely to the ideals. Christ's pain is your pain. Christ died for your sins.
And on the opposite side- 2. Discarding these ideals when they are found to be anachronistic are made easier. It's much less cumbersome to say McCarthy was bad than say the idea of widespread surveillance to keep socialism at bay was bad because it's too amorphous to describe why actually showing pity to the poor is detrimental to US interests (literally a question McCarthy had put in citizenship applications in the 50s which remained long after he was gone).
Hope I got my point across. I can't put in so much effort only to get laughed at by longpostbot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I just like big guys beating the shit out of people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!goomblers
!slots679
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The only correct take, really.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How are great men inherent to fascism? Isn't the whole point of fascism the ablaton of the individual in the service of the state/race? Isn't viglantism, a rejection of the states monopoly on legitimate proactive violence and a willingness to follow ones own moral code, antithetical to a extreme worship of tradition, the state, the military like fascism? The hero of fascism isn't the vigilante, it's the soldier. Number 1. sounds more like an ubermensch, a post moral hero striding past egalitarian untermench to create their own version of heaven on earth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Great men aren't inherent to fascism. Like I said, you can interpret it in both ways. Great men as transcending the social barriers of their time is the prerequisite of transforming into a superhero. The process of transformation and their rhetoric and sermons to people while they erupt from the cocoon of mid to great is what determines whether they are fascist or shining beacons of humanity.
Rhetoric 1 is of fascists - "only they" can make you better. Everything is better with them.
Rhetoric 2 of humanitarians - they will risk/sacrifice themselves for "the truth". For truth is the only ideal that matters. (I'm going on a very Socratic bend here, but it's my interpretation).
If you believe in both rhetorics, you come to a twilight zone where, indeed we are living in a post truth society, because dems' pursuit of putting ideological tints over every news is no less than republicans and both are equally fascistic. Which is why we see these ugly pointless culture wars about Marvel superheroes because both sides want to appropriate fascistic icons for themselves.
Tl;dr -
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Great Man theory is a meme and an evolution to the even more idiotic Great God theory. Only historical materialism provides a decent, scientific understanding of history and social evolution and it is to this day the best attempt humanity has ever given to a proper theory of history.
I don't wanna beat a dead horse but Hegel and the idealists have already been thoroughly trounced over 150 years ago while dialectical materialism still reigns supreme, so I choose option 3, read The Society of the Spectacle.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Uh oh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But really, everyone should read The Society of the Spectacle. It's more relevant today than when it was written.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!comicshitters looks like somebody has been reading (and probably misinterpreting) Watchmen or The Boys or Injustice or something else lately lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The birth of a nation is the first capeshit movie !comicshitters !kino
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The silly robes were completely invented by the movie right? You might be onto something here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
KKK were the original masked vigilantes who had to clean up what the state wouldnt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The people who obsess over those think they're some sort of high intellectual treatise right?
Alan Moore is comicshit like Stan Lee, just because he's edgier and a politicalcel doesn't make his work more high quality lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Alan moore is high quality he writes more then superhero stuff. Plus if you are willing to read sci fi and fantasy capes are not a huge slumming expirence Read From Heck or if you really hate comics read Jerusalem which is a great novel !comicshitters Do not let this man slander Mister Moore
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
For real, I always cringe when people talk about Watchmen as if it is this profound, high art novel. I hate capeshitters so much...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
outdated archetype tbh. snyder was the last hold out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I honestly read Watchmen after reading the Boys and couldn't take the thing seriously because I constantly felt like it was on the verge of revealing Nite Owl owned some kind of Epstein-Island tier p-do r*pe pit and that the big reveal'd be that Doctor Manhattan was raping everyone with his massive blue peepee at all times, and was the true mastermind behind everything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So they're fascist archetypes because of what they say (which is what exactly? *crickets*) and because of their vigilantism.
Fascism is a system of government. Vigilantism operates outside of any system of government. Superheroes are archetypes of a vigilante. That's it. Otherwise, we could conclude that superheroes are an archetype of communists.
Granted, commies and fascists have operated outside of the law to right wrongs as they perceive, but their reasons are different. Same goes for superheroes who are basically like "I don't like actual criminals as defined by a basic set of laws against stealing, killing, or cheating people." Communists and fascists have a bit of that but also expand their definition of criminal into "people who do as they please with their property regardless of them actually stealing, killing, or cheating people out of their just deserts."
There's a lot of superhero stories where they form a "league of justice," but that's centered on combating "the bad guys." They impose a rule of law against a group of clearly defined Bad Guys. Still completely different from communists and fascists' definitions of Bad Guys (which is everyone who is not in their Party).
The superhero archetype also varies from representing the sole and morally good vigilante (Batman) to a group of "vigilantes" who impose their own rule of law on certain people (justice league).
Still no fascist or communist archetype at play here. Could it be that these r-slurs do not understand the differences of moral rules among those governments and vigilantes?
!mottezans, discuss!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They hate both because both are related to masculinity, and masculinity makes bitter, insecure foids and sissy campy degenerates mad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And modern western leftism espouses weakness and victimhood as being a virtue.
They see the superhero as playing the same role as a cop in their discourse. He is a tool and boot of the state to suppress and punish those who have been forgotten and exploited by capitalism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doesn't even make sense considering the more fantastical supervillains. In what way has capitalism oppressed Thanos or Ares the God of War?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It doesn't make sense because almost no one espouses those views lol, it's just a dumb strawman,
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine knowing actual examples of comic book characters.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Uncle Ted is right about leftards.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Must it always come down to s*x?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not necessary related to s*x, at least that's not why bitter and insecure foids hate masculinity, or even the latter.
They hate strong-willed people, and see being weak as a virtue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ohhh.
Hi, Uncle Ted!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Everything is about s*x, except s*x. S*x is about power.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The first gets part of it right. He's the most highly upmarseyd redditor who comes close to being correct, but he's missing the whole part about vigilantism, which is what superheroes are.
The second one is clearly brain-damaged and just as vague as the same point that was made in the OP: [superheroes have political conversations that are somehow fascist; therefore, they're fascist]. He's fascist because he is!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Homelander is making fun of Superman, does this guy not realize that the point of Homelander is not "what if Superman was fascist" it's an accusation: "Superman IS fascist!"
Like i dont agree with the critique but the inherent point of the character isnt to say "well theres some bad apples in the superhero genre"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you dont understand immediately how <\ libshit approved bad guy> is blatantly fascist, it just proves that you are a fascist sealioning bad faith questions
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
FASCIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Exactly they're mainly anonymous vigilantes, Batman isn't using his power to become a strongman leader of America
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Superheroes are communists though?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wasn't the very concept of superheroes made by liberal jews modernizing the trope of the Golem?
Also I thought every good work ever made was made by liberals and chuds are invader parasites that never made anything
ALSO "Grrr people are making something I don't like" chuddery is rampant I see
ALSO^3 "Superheroes are bad because they deliver extrajudicial violent "justice"" but I could bet my spleen they worship Antifa "super soldiers", curious
!nooticers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The r-slurs ARE INSIDE THE THREAD!
How did they get here from reddit??
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't worry, the user above you somehow thinks being working-class and Jewish is impossible as was the case for the creators of Superman, Batman, Green Lantern, Captain America, etc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is a complete strawman, Stan Lee is Jewish and wrote the dialogue of the Spiderman stories whereas Ditko did the drawings, as well as writing Captain America and other stories up until the 70s where other libs like Gerry Conway took over. The idea that there was "Americaman" and "Blue Justice" is ridiculous, the anti-communist and patriotic allegories came because they were made when people needed a morale boost during the literal WW2 and cold wars with the soviets where communists were actual dictators and not your son's weird friends. Even then, the "anti-communist" era of Captain America was so brief that Marvel apologized for it and retconned it to be a right wing nutjob who stole the name
Another thing is like these comics tackling issues like drug crime were created because people demanded that comics comment on these political issues that were seriously affecting the populace. Stan Lee and Gerry Conway used Harry's drug addiction to call out Norman, an old rich white businessman, for only caring about it when it got out of the hood
This regurgitated Moore shit is regarded when you realize hes an anarchist that was a part of vigilante antifa groups. Also what is the state but anonymous men with enormous amountsh of power?
And to the argument of "well the idea of a superpowered individual having the authority to punish evildoers is fascistic" well good thing they collaborate with police then :)
But my other argument against all this is this: theyre not real
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Like it when Superman punches people. Simple as
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not to be a nerd but Rorschach is based off two of Ditko's characters, the more famous Question and Mr. A, both Objectivist characters created by Steve Ditko. Trying to connect Randian philosophy/politics to fascistic politics seems to be their trying to put two things you don't like into the same group. Randian philosophy/politics desires for as minimal state involvement in society and for people to be as objective and rational as they can. Fascism desires for a highly centralized state governing society with high state involvement. Quite funny to see them saying that Watchmen is about "superheroes are FASCIST" when Richard Nixon has been president in the Watchmen world for at least four terms in-universe and the state using superheroes to further their goals, e.g. Dr. Manhattan ending the Vietnam War in only one month. The state is much more authoritarian than the superheroes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't know or care enough about capeshit to have much to say, but I do think it's got to be unhealthy for people to grow up with this slop being their whole culture. Which it seems to be for zoomers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Especially when almost any analogy or reference these frickers make is either capeshit or internet culture brainrot.
I know people like to shit on millenials for being (wo)man-children and very infantile but holy shit are zoomers and gen alpha on a whole new level.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why is it that even beyond the realm of plebbit you buttholes still feel the need to restrain yourselves from indulging in some quality drama. It's like your fricking yourselves out of habit.
But that's only part of it. Even typing the title I already knew the answer to it. The sad fact is that you bastards have somehow become so jaded, so emotionally stunted, and so nihilistic that you can't even motivate yourself to get invested in some good old r-slurred internet drama.
The culture of Arrr drama murdered itself, because you apathetic bastards stopped caring about shit so hard that you can't even get invested in something or some argument purely for the drama of it anymore. You, as a culture and a community, kept picking apart and tearing down any ideological or philosophical position, and you attacked the very idea of taking any sort of ideological position on an issue to the point where now you cant even force yourself to take the contrarian position or the position of wanting more drama out of something.
You grew to despise the idea of caring about anything so much that you can't bring yourself to care about drama.
Now arrr drama, and all it's spinoffs, have become a place for nihilists created by this place to try to give a shit, if only for the sake of drama, or for emotionally stunted narcissists to try to relive their "glory" days of bullying the weird kids in middle school by laughing at random people acting stupid on the internet, just like the plebbitor who tries to relive his childhood by sperging about capeshit on the internet.
And for those of you who will inevitably reply, "imagine caring", the point of drama is to blow everything ridiculously out of proportion, not to not give a shit whatsoever.
And one last thing. And this is real shit, not just ironic drama tardation: despite the fact that drama is inherently a sort of guilty, immoral pleasure, enjoying it doesn't need to involve being actually terrible and peepeeish. Which some of you are; seemingly prevented from giving a frick or caring about anything at all on the internet because of your irony poisoned brains that have decided that it's ok to be a sociopath as long as it's not serious while simultaneously refusing to take anything seriously.
Keep yourselves safe.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/CuratedTumblr/comments/1e20emg/superheroes_as_fascistic_archetypes/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context