Unable to load image

The most powerful graphics card can perform more floating point operations per second than a supercomputer from 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_40_series

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_supercomputing#Petascale_computing_in_the_21st_century

Supercomputer from 2004 (IBM Blue) could perform at 70.720 Tflops.

Geforce RTX 4090 can perform at 82.58 tflops of processing power.

Geforce RTX 4090 was released in 2022.

In 18 years we got tech that would take an entire room or two to fit it in and miniaturized it to fit within a desktop pc.

What we call the cutting edge in computing today should be accessible to your kid as a consumer level product by the time he or she is 18 years old.

The human genome project, a project meant to get a complete sequence of the human genome, cost 2.7 billion dollars to complete. Today, human genome mapping costs are as low as 600 dollars in some cases.

https://3billion.io/blog/whole-genome-sequencing-price-and-trends-2024

https://biology.mit.edu/the-human-genome-project-turns-20-heres-how-it-altered-the-world/

In 21 years the price of genome sequencing for humans went down 4.5 million times.

Another case of the price of tech falling to consumer grade prices within one generation since the first version.

It puts into perspective exactly how fast technology is moving from a practical standpoint rather than a theoretical one. The most expensive tech out there today is going to be what the next generation would be carrying around as a consumer product, and this trend will continue, generation after generation.

The ISS ( fist segment launched in 1998 ) cost 150 billion USD to finish development. The Tiangong space station ( by China 2022 ) meanwhile cost only about 8.5 billion USD.

A 17.64X reduction in price in a 24 year timespan.

Conclusion:

The cost is going down and quality of tech products is going up 10-20X every generation. With the current scale of ongoing research into lab grown food, we might even expect a decline in the prices of food products over time, or at least an increase in their quality over time. The quality of consumer goods available to humans is increasing by a wide margin every generation. The only issue currently lies in solving continental scale and planet scale problems such as global warming, clean water access, global food supply chains, etc. With the population growth rate going down while at the same time tech advancement rates keep stable or accelerate, it is pretty much guaranteed that your children will have a higher quality of life than you as long as you are not poor or in the wrong place on the planet.

We are currently moving at rates where we should be able to solve all our problems faster than we create new problems. A continual improvement in quality of life.

The slowdown is most likely coming from two points:

1. If it ain't broke don't fix it attitude, where humans won't solve a problem until it is effecting too many people.

2. People so used to doubling or tripling of specs in the technological sphere that they are no longer focused enough on improving the efficiency of the software they build on top of the hardware.

We are two industrial revolutions away from living in a post scarcity everybody is provided for society.

Stay strong, just survive the next 40 years and it will all work out.

58
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

2. People so used to doubling or tripling of specs in the technological sphere that they are no longer focused enough on improving the efficiency of the software they build on top of the hardware.

!codecels this means you. Doubly you webshitters and pythoncels.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!codecels hold the line! They can try to make faster hardware, but we can always add more npm packages.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I use a npm app for my AI LLMs and it's r-slurred. It takes literal minutes to start. I'm rewriting it in java bit by bit using the time I wait for it to boot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>complains about startup time

>rewrites in Java

:marseydarkxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still faster

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Doing it by fricking hand would be even faster still :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

write it in rust transphobe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've taken to making all my algorithm O(n^3) just to try and keep up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Add multiple versions of the same library of you need to!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I write code to get paid not to neurodivergentally optimize performance unless management actually cares about it :marseyshrug:


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Webdev detected

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyagree:


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Webdevs should be banned from using JavaScript in their websites until they prove they can use it responsibly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Na dude shit still costs money and time, i try to be as efficient as possible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not my fault you don't upgrade every 6 months

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

PyTorch is not that bad.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have to compile every version I install myself because it doesn't support my gpu out of the box

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like you should buy a better GPU

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

frick u and ur NVIDIA stock

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!fosstards why does nvidia hate freedom

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysquint:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gpu's are the devils hardware

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This pizzamisia will not stand. !friendsofpizzashill

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

keep yourself safe now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

keep yourself safe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My job is to make shit 1% faster so big companies give us more money.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't triple the specs, I triple the requirements.

:#marseybigbrain:

Then I halve the specs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

b-b-but I am a pythoncel.

:marseyenderclutch:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Learn D

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's D?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycock:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

C++ if C++ wasn't aids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BASTE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

GPUs are not equivalent to CPUs in performance. the high flops are only achievable for certain operations. branching is slow to impossible.

Solvers for boolean satisfiability problems are very useful in a wide range of applications and also very difficult to implement on GPUs. The best one I know (not necessarily the best one there is) is https://www.win.tue.nl/~awijs/articles/parafrost_gpu.pdf --- a large part of that still has to be done on CPU, only certain parts can be done by the GPU. One of those parts is 50x faster on GPU than on CPU, but the overall algorithm is only about 2x faster than a state of the art CPU-only solver.

Even on CPUs the speedup compared to older CPUs is not the same for all problems. E.g. AVX-512 instructions perform an operation on eight 32bit numbers simultaneously, yielding an 8x speedup compared to sequential execution, and many common algorithms can take advantage of that. But for problems where that isn't possible a state-of-the-art CPU seems 8x slower than what you would expect when comparing its performance to a CPU from 2004 on e.g. linear algebra problems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

None of these words are in the Bible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

an omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent god would have mentioned them. QED :marseyfedoratip:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

While this is largely true, to my knowledge the IBM Blue Gene supercomputer also had massively wide execution units in order to achieve those TFlop numbers, so they weren't like regular desktop/server CPUs of its time. The gigabit interconnect bandwidth between nodes probably didn't do it any favors either.

A combination of a pair of 96 core Genoa-X's, 12 TiB of RAM, and a couple 4090's would probably compare quite favorably for many, many workloads given equivalent amount of time spent optimizing the code for the target hardware.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For sure.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Supercomputers were always for vectorial application

Boolean satisfiability can easily be solved by gpu, just bruteforce it. :marseyhomofascist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just bruteforce it

:marseyyes:

but then you don't get the x10000 (?) speedup over a 2004 consumer PC.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So what year supercomputer is the modern day computer as good as?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know honestly. It depends on the type of problem. For dense linear algebra your 2004 estimate is pretty accurate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyheart:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What we call the cutting edge in computing today should be accessible to your kid as a consumer level product by the time he or she is 18 years old.

Except the cutting edge in computing isn't just a faster processor. It's quantum computing.

Trust that the glowies are going to keep the lid on that for as long as they can.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>glowies put the lid on it

>it quantum tunnels out anyway

:#marseyfreeman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is Marsey Freeman wearing pearls

And with an arm growing out of her back lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Early Marsey prototype.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyconfused: ooh nice, I haven't seen that Marsey b4

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AFAIK we're still quite far away from actual quantum computers (that can run shor's algorithm), not to mention ones of useful size. Quantum error correction is necessary and expensive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_theorem

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know how complete they are, but one of my :marseyglow: friends who sometimes blabs a bit too much after a few drinks said they can break consumer E2EE almost instantly.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's due to hardware/software backdoors, private sector does most of the work for them and all they need to do is plant holes. Feds focus most of their R&D on war toys and media control these days.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes they have backdoors, at least into western consumer tech, but he said cracking E2EE like it wasn't even there is one of the capabilities of the quantum computer he has access to.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ehhh I have a few :marseyglow: ppl that will say a lot of stuff with enough drinks and they usually overstate what they mean.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The glowies literally cannot because if the US won't provide then either China or India will.

We have already seen this in the case of nukes ( North Korea ), cheap tech ( smartphones, 5G, TV ), and pharmaceuticals ( India prescription drugs )

A global network of trade with nation states still existing means that it is impossible to monopolize any tech or innovation except for the cutting edge in the starting few years of discovery.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure, but it will be longer than 18 years before your kid has a quantum computer in his bedroom.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Depends entirely on whether quantum computers provide anything relevant to consumer grade PCs.

First computer was 1945.

First personal computer was 1974.

First quantum computer was 1998.

First personal quantum computer based on previous rate should be 2027.

So you are probably right.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It could also be a bit like electric car tech.

Technology that existed for decades, but coincidentally only went mainstream once global car sales were projected to fall for the first time ever.

If it's complicated and expensive enough to develop for consumers, there can be market forces that prevent it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, I think its more like AI took off first so that's where all the money went. Quantum computing would get the same sort of funding once AI tech reaches maturity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Quantum computers are necessarily good for consumer applications.

They're very specialized.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We are all going to make it. Nothing is fricked here, dude. This is fine. :wholesomeseal:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyotter:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

as long as you are not poor or in the wrong place on the planet.

Skill issue

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gigachad_brony alt? :#marseyinvestigate:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My writing quality isn't that shit. There are no run on sentences here.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!nooticers thoughts? :#marseyinvestigate:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You'll probably get a lot of people skeptical about these technological advances continuing to happen but IDK it seems like we've generally overcome some serious barriers, I think we're up for the challenge.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@X is this a gigachad_brony alt

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17224552078670464.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Full screenshot or fake

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17224593376977336.webp

:marseysigh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI edited image.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gracias

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI edited video.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycantsneed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@X :marseydisagreefast:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

An important bit you're missing is that the 4090's core count is about half of Blue Gene in 2004.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fair. I am not rewriting my article however and you still have a supercomputer in your pocket.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

does anyone have experience with an external gpu setup? I have a pc with decent ram/cpu butt weak graphics. It has the hookups (thuderbolt 4) for an external gpu and if i do it itll be approx $1000 with a decent gpu. Are there any problems trying that or no?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The bandwidth is still very limiting.

Heavily dependent on the game and how powerful your GPU is, but you can expect between 15-50% performance drop from what the GPU is able to do by in a proper system. You also get a lot more stuttering.

Considering the GPU is the most expensive component of a PC these days, it's probably cheaper to sell/move on your old one and build new one, than pay for a good GPU with performance 2 tiers lower AND pay for enclosure.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

thanks for the advice. I think i might try the external set up and if its shit ill just do tue build idea and put the gpu in that. I plan on getting a high end gpu if i can find a good deal.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

IMHO for most GPGPU tasks the limited bandwidth is not the bottleneck, or you can find a way to work around it. Don't know about gaming, but games that need fast GPUs tend to also need fast CPUs, maybe more than a typical laptop CPU.

If you're on Linux, "hotplug" (connecting the eGPU while your laptop is already running) is difficult, it's likely that you won't get it to work and will have to restart every time you want to connect your eGPU.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

thanks for ypur thoughts. my cpu is pretty good/recent generation. All the hardware on the pc good, butt the gpu. Its a laptop, so they have a weak gpu i think to save space and lower the temp. im not on linux, butt the pc restarts in <30s so thats not an issue either way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The restart itself is quick, but if I'm already working pn something I have a couple programs open, and 40 tabs in the web browser, I have to save/bookmark everything, close everything, and then after restart reopen everything -- some programs do it automatically, some don't. I have to restart docker containers, jupyter, reconnect to various APIs, etc... that takes a few minutes and is very annoying.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wow, thats crazy. I look forward to the day that that is a problem for me

!slots444

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's worth trying and then returning if it doesn't work.

I'm curious to see your results.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ilyk if i go through with it :marseytransimplosion:

!slots222

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>The ISS ( fist segment launched in 1998 ) cost 150 billion USD to finish development. The Tiangong space station ( by China 2022 ) meanwhile cost only about 8.5 billion USD. A 17.64X reduction in price in a 24 year timespan.

Very optimistic of you to assume that the ISS didn't cost so much because of contractors filling their pockets and that it wouldn't cost as much or the same today as well lol (adjusted for inflation)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The ISS replacement is expected to cost around 12-13 billion USD last I checked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't see how these leaps and bounds in tech have inherent incentives to provide for everyone in society, which is a misguided assumption.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They don't, but the cheaper things are the more easily accessible they become

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

2. People so used to doubling or tripling of specs in the technological sphere that they are no longer focused enough on improving the efficiency of the software they build on top of the hardware.

Do people believe this meme? Software isn't suddenly getting 100x slower because some tard decided to write a react app. Consumer applications are bottlenecked by cache misses and IO, which aren't captured by benchmarks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lmao, software has been getting shitter and shitter because the acceptable level of autism required to write software has gotten more and more entry level. React is already 2-3 orders of magnitude too slow for people who think about how to avoid mallocing more than a handful of times in a program.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If that were true developers wouldn't be able to make far better looking games at the end of a playstation generation with the same hardware than at the beginning of it.

( I am assuming that the end of gen games run on the base starting of the gen hardware as well instead of just the end of gen upgraded models )

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

video games are among a very small group of products where "fast" actually matters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what you said doesn't disprove my point

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I assure you I do not subscribe to nazism/nationalism/fascism nor have I taken part in the gassing/ethnic cleansing of 6M* people within the last century …… however, if you have proof to the contrary you should report me 🤨 and unlike you I can own up to what I do — instead of hiding on sub and calling folks names.

Snapshots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_40_series:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_supercomputing#Petascale_computing_in_the_21st_century:

https://3billion.io/blog/whole-genome-sequencing-price-and-trends-2024:

https://biology.mit.edu/the-human-genome-project-turns-20-heres-how-it-altered-the-world/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.