/h/nerdshit House Femboy
MayflyAlt-98 Your/Grace Self-taught hypebeast  2mo ago (youtube.com) 246 thread views #300059

Exploiting the kinetic potential of swaying trees to make electricity :marseythumbsup2: :marseychemist: :marseymechanic:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BSxK5VagSb8

30
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Ok, so wind power but less efficient.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

depends on the math is after you look at the gain in productivity bu not having build a windmill or pollute the scenery with windmills. If this is cheaper/easier to mass produce and apply it may work better overall.

!slots111

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Ok, so wind power solar power but less efficient.

everything except nuclear

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>nuclear

ok so harnessing the power of super novas but less efficient

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But also not requiring wind turbines.

I stg dramatards can be such redditors (derogatory) sometimes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's more efficient to build a hundred foot tall structure out of steel, fiberglass, and concrete than to attach a pully to a tree? Or do you mean this wastes wind?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's more efficient to generate 3 phase AC. This cannot generate 3 phase AC.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So it's wasting wind?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's wasting copper and neodymium. Rotating generators are used for a reason, they're better.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That doesn't seem like much waste.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At any scale to be useful, it would be massively wasteful.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because you said so? Waste is relative so without anything to compare it to or numbers you're just sperging out about some best practice as if it's the end all be all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you r-slurred?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Who cares about efficiency if it's cool?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.