RedeeIVIedSinnerI/We
Iβm 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
CEO_of_misogyny 2mo ago#7017422
spent 0 currency on pings
But also not requiring wind turbines.
I stg dramatards can be such redditors (derogatory) sometimes
It's more efficient to build a hundred foot tall structure out of steel, fiberglass, and concrete than to attach a pully to a tree? Or do you mean this wastes wind?
Because you said so? Waste is relative so without anything to compare it to or numbers you're just sperging out about some best practice as if it's the end all be all.
depends on the math is after you look at the gain in productivity bu not having build a windmill or pollute the scenery with windmills. If this is cheaper/easier to mass produce and apply it may work better overall.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok, so wind power but less efficient.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But also not requiring wind turbines.
I stg dramatards can be such redditors (derogatory) sometimes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
wind powersolar power but less efficient.everything except nuclear
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ok so harnessing the power of super novas but less efficient
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's more efficient to build a hundred foot tall structure out of steel, fiberglass, and concrete than to attach a pully to a tree? Or do you mean this wastes wind?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's more efficient to generate 3 phase AC. This cannot generate 3 phase AC.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So it's wasting wind?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's wasting copper and neodymium. Rotating generators are used for a reason, they're better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That doesn't seem like much waste.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At any scale to be useful, it would be massively wasteful.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because you said so? Waste is relative so without anything to compare it to or numbers you're just sperging out about some best practice as if it's the end all be all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you r-slurred?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Who cares about efficiency if it's cool?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
depends on the math is after you look at the gain in productivity bu not having build a windmill or pollute the scenery with windmills. If this is cheaper/easier to mass produce and apply it may work better overall.
!slots111
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context