Total abortions by country (1922-2021) :marseybibgenocide:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=AFo5-OI-OL4

!mathematics !catholics !babykillers take your own conclusions and takes from this data.

It's the cumulative number by country.

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

cumulative

what's the point other than trolling christstrags

I'd be interested in a per country per year one tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The video includes yearly data worldwide.

But I found this

During the late 1950s and 1960s, it is estimated that the Soviet Union had some of the highest abortion rates in the world. The abortion rate during this period is not known for sure, because the Soviet Union did not start releasing abortion statistics until perestroika. The best estimates, which are based on surveys of medical professionals during this time, say that about 6 to 7 million abortions were performed per year

Also

One of the few insights we have regarding abortion during the late 1950s is a survey, conducted between 1958 and 1959, of 26,000 women seeking abortions, 20,000 from urban areas and 6,000 from rural areas. Several facts can be gathered from this survey regarding what kind of women sought abortions and their reasons for doing so. First of all, an "overwhelming majority" of the women were married, though the survey results do not give an exact percentage. Second, we can learn how many children the women had. Of the urban women, 10.2% were childless, 41.2% had one child, 32.1% had two children, and 16.5% had three or more children, making the median number of children 1.47. Of the rural women, 6.2% were childless, 26.9% had one child, 30% had two children, and 36.9% had three or more children, the median number of children being 2.06. Of women seeking abortions, urban women were more likely to have fewer or no children.

Survey taken in the Soviet Union

!foidmoment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The creation of agriculture and settled urban life is the root of all evil and sin, we are forcing ourselves into concrete labyrinths

Known, it's the only pill that matters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Genesis 4:2-5

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Genesis 4:2-5

Again she gave birth, to Cain's brother Abel. Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. As time passed, it happened that Cain brought an offering to Tʜᴇ Lᴏʀᴅ from the fruit of the ground. Abel also brought some of the firstborn of his flock and of the fat of it. Tʜᴇ Lᴏʀᴅ respected Abel and his offering, but he didn't respect Cain and his offering. Cain was very angry, and the expression on his face fell.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cain brought an offering to Tʜᴇ Lᴏʀᴅ from the fruit of the ground. Abel also brought some of the firstborn of his flock and of the fat of it. Tʜᴇ Lᴏʀᴅ respected Abel and his offering, but he didn't respect Cain and his offering

!historychads thoughts on Cain? What could have he offered to make God more pleased?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think :marseyquestion: one understanding is fricking that Abel gave the fricking best of what he had but Cain didn't give the fricking best of what he had, b-word?

Genesis is a fricking lot of poetic metaphor that is fricking hard to grasp. Very many things said in very few words

@Corinthian thoughts, b-word?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@nuclearshill @BWC St. Augustine's discourse on the nature of Cain's crime, from Book XV Chapter 7 of City of God:

But though God made use of this very mode of address which we have been endeavoring to explain, and spoke to Cain in that form by which He was wont to accommodate Himself to our first parents and converse with them as a companion, what good influence had it on Cain? Did he not fulfill his wicked intention of killing his brother even after he was warned by God's voice? For when God had made a distinction between their sacrifices, neglecting Cain's, regarding Abel's, which was doubtless intimated by some visible sign to that effect; and when God had done so because the works of the one were evil but those of his brother good, Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell. For thus it is written: And the Lord said to Cain, Why are you angry, and why is your countenance fallen? If you offer rightly, but do not rightly distinguish, have you not sinned? Fret not yourself, for unto you shall be his turning, and you shall rule over him. Genesis 4:6-7 In this admonition administered by God to Cain, that clause indeed, If you offer rightly, but do not rightly distinguish, have you not sinned? is obscure, inasmuch as it is not apparent for what reason or purpose it was spoken, and many meanings have been put upon it, as each one who discusses it attempts to interpret it according to the rule of faith. The truth is, that a sacrifice is rightly offered when it is offered to the true God, to whom alone we must sacrifice. And it is not rightly distinguished when we do not rightly distinguish the places or seasons or materials of the offering, or the person offering, or the person to whom it is presented, or those to whom it is distributed for food after the oblation. Distinguishing is here used for discriminating — whether when an offering is made in a place where it ought not or of a material which ought to be offered not there but elsewhere; or when an offering is made at a wrong time, or of a material suitable not then but at some other time; or when that is offered which in no place nor any time ought to be offered; or when a man keeps to himself choicer specimens of the same kind than he offers to God; or when he or any other who may not lawfully partake profanely eats of the oblation. In which of these particulars Cain displeased God, it is difficult to determine. But the Apostle John, speaking of these brothers, says, Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous. 1 John 3:12 He thus gives us to understand that God did not respect his offering because it was not rightly distinguished in this, that he gave to God something of his own but kept himself to himself. For this all do who follow not God's will but their own, who live not with an upright but a crooked heart, and yet offer to God such gifts as they suppose will procure from Him that He aid them not by healing but by gratifying their evil passions. And this is the characteristic of the earthly city, that it worships God or gods who may aid it in reigning victoriously and peacefully on earth not through love of doing good, but through lust of rule. The good use the world that they may enjoy God: the wicked, on the contrary, that they may enjoy the world would fain use God — those of them, at least, who have attained to the belief that He is and takes an interest in human affairs. For they who have not yet attained even to this belief are still at a much lower level. Cain, then, when he saw that God had respect to his brother's sacrifice, but not to his own, should have humbly chosen his good brother as his example, and not proudly counted him his rival. But he was angry, and his countenance fell. This angry regret for another person's goodness, even his brother's, was charged upon him by God as a great sin. And He accused him of it in the interrogation, Why are you angry, and why is your countenance fallen? For God saw that he envied his brother, and of this He accused him. For to men, from whom the heart of their fellow is hid, it might be doubtful and quite uncertain whether that sadness bewailed his own wickedness by which, as he had learned, he had displeased God, or his brother's goodness, which had pleased God, and won His favorable regard to his sacrifice. But God, in giving the reason why He refused to accept Cain's offering and why Cain should rather have been displeased at himself than at his brother, shows him that though he was unjust in not rightly distinguishing, that is, not rightly living and being unworthy to have his offering received, he was more unjust by far in hating his just brother without a cause.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Genesis 4:6-7

Tʜᴇ Lᴏʀᴅ said to Cain, "Why are you angry? Why has the expression of your face fallen? If you do well, will it not be lifted up? If you don't do well, sin crouches at the door. Its desire is for you, but you are to rule over it."

1 John 3:12

unlike Cain, who was of the evil one, and killed his brother. Why did he kill him? Because his works were evil, and his brother's righteous.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@ObamaBinLaden say this as a feminist ally

This is just one of those never ending debate topics in religious camps. @ObamaBinLaden is 17 again! (I'll keep it short and not go into the whole beasts of labor rabbithole)

Cain grew vegetables, God rejected it because it was not what you offer too the supreme being. He knew that man is sinful. If sin is inside you, you need too let it out by doing something for God. One of those sins? Thirst for violence. Abel satisfied his with the animal sacrifice.

Basically Cain was a poser, God called him out on his bullshit, Cain got big mad, kills Abel.

God says https://media.tenor.com/jNzyLSukKuEAAAAx/ironic-star-wars.webp

That's the summary yo, remember it !saved

@nuclearshill can you create an eschatology ping group?

The Christian and Catholic ping groups are just full of thin skinned always-triggered soyboys who have no knowledge of Jerusalem and Israelite history but are always the loudest too quote scripture

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>THIN SKINNED ALWAYS-TRIGGERED SOYBOYS WHO HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF JERUSALEM AND ISRAELITE HISTORY BUT ARE ALWAYS THE LOUDEST TOO QUOTE SCRIPTURE

:#marseyme: :#chadsoylent: !christians !catholics !historychads

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@ACA new ping idea just dropped

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

CAIN'S OFFERING SUCKED BECUASE IT WAS fricking SOME STALE BUTT CEASER SALAD

IF HE BROUGHT LIKE A fricking GIANT PUMPKIN WITH A fricking KICKASS SPOOKY FACE THINGS WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A fricking GIANT PUMPKIN WITH A fricking KICKASS SPOOKY FACE

One could call it a spowoky owoky pumpakin, perhaps

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is likely a vestige of some ancient conflict between herders and farmers. The herdchads won and depicted their enemies as the Cain-jak

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyreapcrying: :!marseysheep2: :!#marseyfatherjoseph:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Herdcels hate agriculture-chads 'cause they made urbanization and therefore large powerful states possible.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:mongoljak: Nice state you've got there.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.