https://old.reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/1fznu5u/nobel_winners_in_chemistry/
!ifrickinglovescience !chemistry !biology
For their work at AI to predict protein structures (AlphaFold)
Also
Gook foid wins Nobel Prize in Literature
!bookworms here's my double Nobel thread
Reminder that Alfred Nobel was a based chemistchad
.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's over for Scels. They're going to the back of the unemployment line with the liberal arts chaff
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ChatGPT can already tell you a synthetic route if you give it an IUPAC name.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Huh? DNA sequencing is the physical technology of reading physical DNA and getting the base pair sequence. AI can't really help with that. If you mean like finding exons and stuff there are computational and statical methods to find genes from DNA sequencing but you need to review it as machines often times get results which are statistically correct but biologically wrong. !biology Right now computational stuff in biology is kinda shaky and I expect there will be a scandal with single cell sequencing as the current methods of cell type assignment methods are mathematically shaky and built on other shaky research.
ChatGPT is fricking r-slurred and if I have another group member submit their part of an essay as a bulleted list divided into sections with lots of flowery BS language I'll sent angry emails to openAI. Like bro no one was writing like this before chatgpt and now everyone is writing like this. lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes but AI is great at bullpooping and publishing fake but plausible results, which is good for your budding science career
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
With utmost astonishment, we bear witness to the recent and extraordinary transformation in the quality of written assignments, a metamorphosis meticulously orchestrated by the advent of ChatGPT, culminating in a state of affairs that is, quite frankly, absolutely absurd.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Would we need a humanoid robot to completely automatize what you do on the lab?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sequencing is already automated in the sense computers do it. We just need humans to prepare the isolation and the libraries. The big revolution will be pacbio and Oxford nano pore sequencing becoming cheaper as it means we can finally move away from short read illunmia sequencing which kinda sucks for genome assemblies as the read lengths are short which creates a lot of ambiguity in high repetitive genomes and genome sections. Nanopore is esp cool. It is done in devices which are smaller than a modern smartphone and can be connected to any laptop or phone with USB. It means you can do live sequencing of DNA in the field and have all the data directly transferred to your devices.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
ESL speakers have been hit hard by grammarly and chat gpt
I miss charming engrish emails
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Here are some key ways ChatGPT can improve human communication:
Enhanced Interaction and Engagement: ChatGPT enables seamless communication between users and AI systems, fostering better interaction and engagement. It can simulate emotional responses and provide a more humanized communication experience.
Improved Communication Skills: ChatGPT can help users improve their communication skills through targeted prompts and roleplay scenarios. For example, users can practice communicating with difficult colleagues or managing relationships with people who have specific communication styles.
Personalization and Efficiency: ChatGPT can tailor its communication style and responses to individual users, making interactions more personalized and efficient. This can lead to better understanding and more productive exchanges.
Clarity and Plain Language: ChatGPT can help users communicate complex information in clear, plain language that is easier for others to understand. This is particularly useful in fields like healthcare, where effective communication is crucial.
Empathy and Emotional Intelligence: By simulating emotional responses, ChatGPT can help users develop greater empathy and emotional intelligence in their communication. This can lead to more meaningful and impactful interactions.
Continuous Improvement: ChatGPT can continuously learn from user feedback and dialog data to enhance its own communication abilities over time, providing an ever-improving experience for users.
In summary, ChatGPT's natural language processing capabilities, personalization features, and capacity for continuous learning make it a powerful tool for enhancing human communication skills, clarity, and engagement across a variety of contexts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wow, I must make counter arguments to this that are totally mine and mine alone.
1. Enhanced Interaction and Engagement:
While ChatGPT aims to enable seamless communication between users and AI systems by simulating emotional responses and providing a more humanized experience, this can lead to a superficial understanding of human emotions and interactions. The AI does not possess consciousness or genuine feelings, so any emotional responses are generated based on patterns in data rather than real empathy or understanding. This simulation might mislead users into believing they are engaging in meaningful interactions, potentially diminishing the value they place on genuine human connections. Moreover, reliance on AI for interaction could reduce opportunities for individuals to develop and refine their interpersonal skills with real people.
2. Improved Communication Skills:
Counter-Argument:
Although ChatGPT can provide users with scenarios to practice communication, it cannot fully replicate the complexity and unpredictability of human interactions. Real-life conversations involve nuanced emotions, body language, and spontaneous reactions that an AI cannot authentically reproduce. Practicing with an AI might give users a false sense of confidence in their communication abilities without adequately preparing them for the challenges of engaging with real individuals who may not respond in predictable or programmable ways. This could ultimately hinder personal growth in communication skills rather than enhance it.
3. Personalization and Efficiency:
While personalization can make interactions with ChatGPT more efficient, it may also lead to a narrowing of perspectives. By tailoring responses to individual preferences, the AI might inadvertently reinforce existing biases and limit exposure to diverse viewpoints. This echo chamber effect can hinder critical thinking and reduce opportunities for users to challenge their own assumptions. Additionally, over-reliance on AI for efficient communication might diminish patience and tolerance for the natural pace and complexity of human conversations, potentially leading to frustration or disengagement in social settings that do not offer the same level of tailored responsiveness.
4. Clarity and Plain Language:
Although simplifying complex information is valuable, ChatGPT's interpretations may sometimes oversimplify or misrepresent critical details, especially in specialized fields like healthcare. Nuances and subtleties that are essential for accurate understanding might be lost, leading to misunderstandings or misinformed decisions. Relying on AI to convey important information could also discourage individuals from developing the necessary skills to comprehend and communicate complex concepts themselves, potentially leading to a general decline in subject matter expertise and critical literacy skills over time.
5. Empathy and Emotional Intelligence:
While ChatGPT can simulate empathy through programmed responses, it lacks genuine emotional intelligence. The absence of true consciousness means it cannot authentically understand or share the feelings of users. This simulation might lead to interactions that feel hollow or unfulfilling upon closer reflection. Furthermore, using AI to develop empathy could be counterproductive, as it does not provide the rich, reciprocal feedback that comes from interacting with real people. This might impair a user's ability to read and respond to genuine emotional cues in others, ultimately hampering the development of meaningful human relationships.
6. Continuous Improvement:
Even though ChatGPT can learn from user interactions, its learning is confined to patterns in data rather than genuine understanding or creativity. The AI's improvements are bound by its programming and the quality of data it receives, which may include biases or inaccuracies. Continuous learning without proper oversight might reinforce and amplify these biases, leading to inappropriate or harmful responses. Additionally, users might develop unrealistic expectations about the capabilities of AI, potentially leading to overdependence on technology and underestimation of human judgment and expertise.
In Summary:
While ChatGPT offers impressive natural language processing abilities and the promise of enhanced communication, there are significant concerns regarding its impact on human interaction. The reliance on AI for engagement and communication could lead to a decline in interpersonal skills, reduced appreciation for genuine human connection, and potential reinforcement of biases. The limitations inherent in AI—such as the lack of true empathy, consciousness, and understanding—mean that it cannot fully replicate or replace the depth and richness of human communication. Therefore, it is crucial to approach the use of ChatGPT with caution, ensuring that it serves as a tool to supplement rather than supplant authentic human interactions and personal development in communication skills.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
😴😴😴
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sorry ma'am, looks like his delusions have gotten worse. We'll have to admit him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If they keep training the model on Reddit, maybe in 2077
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But think of how many pronouns Reddit will teach the ai in the meantime
Putting the
in
spookieturkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"lol learn to code"
"if your job is threatened by immigrants, I guess you aren't very good at your job/your job isn't important"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This but unironically.
Coding is the industry with the most future scope left.
Immigrants are brought in to do the jobs that slaves used to do. You are literally complaining about not getting the jobs nobody wants anyways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context