Probably not tos, they could just create. And if discovery had been set in the future in the first place that would have worked too.
Honestly i think they just suffer from a lack of original storytelling and that sets the rest of it up to be nitpicked. Quit making prequels and you dont have to deal with this shit
Counter-argument: It's sci-fi. It's basically magic. They have widespread use of teleporters and nobody seems to bat an eye at it despite the clear impossibility of it all.
Like Star Wars is set in the future and has its fair share of magic as a result (lightsabers), but Star Trek is in the way, way, way future. Just stop thinking about the practicality of it and enjoy the show.
They're basically the same thing imo. Only real difference is the magic in scifi is arguably man-made magic whereas the magic in fantasy tends to be more "natural".
But they still revolve around complete impossibilities to carry the story.
Redactor0naori/oppa
The Rachel Dolezal of Maronite Christians.
tempest 1mo ago#7171535
spent 0 currency on pings
I don't think they're raging about it, but if you read their comments, they all understand that the shows are about the characters interacting with each other. They don't employ actual spergs on the writing staff. So yeah, it's gotta be annoying. But on the other hand I think they find the spergs kind of charming sometimes and appreciate that they're making money off them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you think the writers for the show find these neurodivergents annoying?
Like they're just trying to tell a scifi story and these guys are all over it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Probably not tos, they could just create. And if discovery had been set in the future in the first place that would have worked too.
Honestly i think they just suffer from a lack of original storytelling and that sets the rest of it up to be nitpicked. Quit making prequels and you dont have to deal with this shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Counter-argument: It's sci-fi. It's basically magic. They have widespread use of teleporters and nobody seems to bat an eye at it despite the clear impossibility of it all.
Like Star Wars is set in the future and has its fair share of magic as a result (lightsabers), but Star Trek is in the way, way, way future. Just stop thinking about the practicality of it and enjoy the show.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Star Wars isn't set in the future. It's set a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
flying cars is th future sorry
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Scifi is different from fantasy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is a lie that {{they}} want you to believe.
They're basically the same thing imo. Only real difference is the magic in scifi is arguably man-made magic whereas the magic in fantasy tends to be more "natural".
But they still revolve around complete impossibilities to carry the story.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lecture me more on hard magic vs soft magic systems
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't think they're raging about it, but if you read their comments, they all understand that the shows are about the characters interacting with each other. They don't employ actual spergs on the writing staff. So yeah, it's gotta be annoying. But on the other hand I think they find the spergs kind of charming sometimes and appreciate that they're making money off them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context