Unable to load image

Des Moines city council :marseycorn: takes steps so they don't become overrun with homeless :marseystinky:. Reddit soy :soyjaktantrum: posts call to action!

https://old.reddit.com/r/desmoines/comments/1el03w5/dsm_city_council_claims_that_they_are_not/

								

								

Be sure to contact every member of the Des Moines city council and tell them you support their final solution to the homeless question.

48
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!neolibs what's the evidence based solution to the homeless question? :#marseypoor: :#marseyseizure:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseypoorgenocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Enslavement

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

KEEP YOURSELF SAFE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Homeless people would be better off mowing my lawn wearing a shock collar

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Something that takes them away from the zombie drugs. It's not going to be pretty though so good luck getting voter support.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So killing them? :#marseyeric: :marseyfedposthmmm#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Illegal comment in Bongland

:#marseybongcop:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm sure it's illegal in Brazil as well.

@BrasilIguana já que você é o nosso advogado, a PF teria material suficiente no rdrama pra botar todos os !macacos em cana?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just saying you want to kill some homeless? Probably not, unless you took steps to prepare

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What about my comments saying BIPOC? Do they fit as crime of racism?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseymugshot:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think you would need to direct them at someone, just saying BIPOC shouldn't count I don't think

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>you would :marseywood: need to direct them at someone

What if I said you are neighborrdly?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Pass laws that encourage them to live in homeless cities like Seattle and San Francisco. This way, the cities that can best help them can do so! It's called specialization of labor, sweaty.

:marseyfluffy:

Honestly, homelessness in the US has already been solved since practically every city and town has half-way homes. Homelessness as seen on TV and the internet is really just junkies not wanting to kick their addiction (can't use half-way homes because they have rules against using drugs, derp). "Homelessness" is really a junkie problem, but West and East Coast libtards still haven't figured that out.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but West and East Coast libtards still haven't figured that out.

They have but NGOs block real solutions

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They've tried giving them free drugs and drug accessories.

If that didn't work, what will?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Giving them a really large amount of drugs will solve the problem :marseycocaine:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you didn't care about morals whatsoever you could solve the drug problem :marseycanofworms: by having drugs :marseyrubberhoseheroin: confiscated by police/feds poisoned and rereleased back to distributors/addicts

After a year it wouldn't be an issue. That said it's an evil that shouldn't be implemented

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They tried that with moonshine.

I think they should just put the drugs in a big pit with slippery walls.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As long as it's televised

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

park a U-Haul full of fent under a bridge somewhere and the problem would solve itself overnight

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How so? Don't the NGOs get government-approved money for their projects? It's always seemed like government keeps picking losers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the problem disappears so do the NGOs' reasons for being and their ability to siphon money from the taxpayer. They provide bullshit feel-good solutions that pander to progressive sensibilities and further exacerbate things providing justification for further funding from our single party state. The politicians "picking losers" (their buddies) is by design.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, so I'm back to blaming government then.

:marseyangel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Property is a luxury market that's being propped up by retirement interests and government investors, being regulated as a mandatory necessity market. Consumers demand an alternative, and "tiny homes" is a cuck middle ground the government barely allows.

We need homelessness to become more viable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

omg, you're such a Greuselle!

:marseyteehee:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Funnel taxpayer money to unaccountable NGOs, duh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The NGO industrial complex is just the military industrial complex for progressoids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Both are unironically just job programs/welfare with a purpose so people don't become too rowdy - military for rurals with no life prospects and NGO's for (mostly female) urbanoids with crippling college debt.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Build new asylums and throw them in there

e z p z

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/-3_Tttah_hcAAAAx/soylentgreen-people.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

has to be a multipronged approach. one issue among many is that the only type of legitimate housing that a lot of street people would be suited for (SRO) just doesn't exist in a lot of places anymore, and that falls under the general "blue states are catastrophically bad at housing policy" rubric. but whatever we do, as long as setting up a tent somewhere in the heart of a city remains an option, some people will choose it. and as a lolbertarian I think that's fine as long as we don't enshrine it as an all-encompassing right and are able to kick them out of spaces that should be for other things.

the point of criminalizing street people behavior isn't to eliminate it, it's to push it out of nice orderly spaces and into more marginal ones, instead of letting the street people claim everything even halfway "public" for themselves.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.