Unable to load image

"Donald Trump scowls as jury is picked to decide how much he owes for denying s*x assault"

https://apnews.com/article/trump-carroll-lawsuit-defamation-trial-5e536a371df5245b7bf390d1f864b5dc

								

								

Best part:

when the judge asked during jury selection if anyone felt he had been treated unfairly by the court system, Trump raised his hand slyly. The gesture drew laughter from the crowd

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17054354683097885.webp

And then as a follow-up, he started dunking on the b-word who he sexually assaulted in the first place

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-e-jean-carroll-trial-truth-social-b2479559.html

17
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>have s*x with foid

>life ruined

:marseymanysuchcases#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ive seen the photos. I know what he pulls,

X

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He should have her shot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It looks like the explanation is right there in the thread. The comic is a parody of stereotypical “coming out” scenarios represented in media. It psychologically primes people for the acceptance of such behaviors (both in the real world sense–that of being gay–and in the contextual sense–that of being a demon designed solely to kill everyone). Indeed, I'm curious why you're not “outraged” about the comic itself equating gays to murderous traitors. Instead you're upset about someone CALLING OUT this comic for its psychological propaganda. Indeed, not even that. You're upset about the no-no word he used in doing so!

Are your feelings hurt by seeing a no-no word? What exactly is your problem with the post itself? List, specifically, what your problem is with the post. Is it really just the no-no word? Why should anyone care about your feelings when you're defending the institutional r*pe of children and the social spread of incurable diseases?

Why are you incapable of defending your ideological beliefs using objective scientific data? Not just in the contextual sense, but in the broader sense of why you seem to want to censor people for saying truth when it hurts your feelings.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.