https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1758529993280205039
Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 16, 2024
https://x.com/SmythRadio/status/1758701969458253850
Short clip for the discerning dramatard ☝️
Celeb reviews 👇
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So basically democracy is a threat to democracy so we have to censor chuds to keep the status quo we've maintained since the end of WW2 at all costs and the government is pooping themselves since they don't control the narrative anymore?
Elon…. Please buy Reddit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes and that's a good thing!
Stop being a fascist and welcome corporatism and state surveillance.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Let me hold onto those Rights for you, I'll safeguard them for you!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Thank you. Pinned for great summary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Oh look the twitter rightoids are sperging out over nothing again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
omg how can one woman be 10 cutest women put together cuteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She looks like genderbent Ben bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Brett Cooper looks like Ben in a wig and I'd eat the corn out of her shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!moidmoment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
and ben is very breedable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The only comment in this thread that makes sense to me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hit him with every award
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's 100% ben in a wig, the booba is basically gigatitty nonsense bait.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Abby Shapiro is a Mossad psyop to end antisemitism in straggots.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That picture makes me want to fedpost her, but when she turns to the side she turns into
I wish I could find it, she's literally doing the face and hand thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hidden nose shape angle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Classic foidery
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
look at this libtard cuck thinking FASCIST GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP is nothing!!!!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm so sick of le Dilbert man.
He's like the new Neil Degrassi Tyson
He fricking sucks
Not really related, just wanted to put it out there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
le coffee amirite?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Actually, it's herbal tea.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
He was really funny for about one year in the mid 1990s. Should have dropped dead after that and he'd still be loved by everyone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Tbh the cartoon slaps tho
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nothing Tucker Carlson does matters or will ever matter, that's why he's on X and not even on a network anymore.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!r-slurs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
R.I.P. Terry.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If this doesn't come with some meaty new declassified Hunter Biden docs, I'm not interested, ya feel me?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
And without the trip either apparently.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
just a vague sense of mysticism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!nonchuds I'm not going to watch all that but I think the chuds just realized how Liberal power mechanisms work and it's blowing their minds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're down to blow it up let's do it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Mad how quickly Tucker managed to completely squander his relevancy by only ever speaking to absolute cranks no one cares about
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And Putin.
But yeah. How many times did he talk to Andrew Tate?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You can check out Lee Fang's substack for more and he's not even a chud. Dude just realises that free speech should not be a partisan thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
U realize free speech is a chud only position now right? If you support free speech u support violence against black bodies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Let the bodies hit the floor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i support violence against
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Rightoids are such annoying
cute twinks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
THATS MY PURSE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
AH DON'T KNOW YOU!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
kicks you in the shmesticals
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
this guy is a terrible speaker
like moldbug, he could explain this in 5 mins or with a infographic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The top linked tweet explains it in 3 minutes and I pinned a good summary to my mind just here at the top of the thread
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No, it doesn't lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
K
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It looks like the explanation is right there in the thread. The comic is a parody of stereotypical “coming out” scenarios represented in media. It psychologically primes people for the acceptance of such behaviors (both in the real world sense–that of being gay–and in the contextual sense–that of being a demon designed solely to kill everyone). Indeed, I'm curious why you're not “outraged” about the comic itself equating gays to murderous traitors. Instead you're upset about someone CALLING OUT this comic for its psychological propaganda. Indeed, not even that. You're upset about the no-no word he used in doing so!
Are your feelings hurt by seeing a no-no word? What exactly is your problem with the post itself? List, specifically, what your problem is with the post. Is it really just the no-no word? Why should anyone care about your feelings when you're defending the institutional r*pe of children and the social spread of incurable diseases?
Why are you incapable of defending your ideological beliefs using objective scientific data? Not just in the contextual sense, but in the broader sense of why you seem to want to censor people for saying truth when it hurts your feelings.
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context