Wade bros

Such a reimbursement practice may be unusual and the lack of any documentary corroboration

understandably concerning. Yet the testimony .... and was

not so incredible as to be inherently unbelievable

But pages later

Yet reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected

lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding

of an appearance of impropriety and the need to make proportional efforts to cure it.

Clown of a ruling. If she's lying about the dates and you're doubting that why are you so ready to believe her about the cash reimbursement.

So the corrupt DA that perjured herself is facing no consequences? Nice job, "judge", didn't see that coming

What

"Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."

Snapshots:

https://x.com/PhilHollowayEsq/status/1768717884421976176:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)