Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How can someone study the history of the slave trade and yet have such a poor gasp of investments? Even on Jane Austen novels there were characters with shares on West-Indies plantations providing some extra income :marseycracka:

!historychads

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's r-slurred at everything except grifting.

The least deserved Pulitzers going to blacks, istg

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The grifting may have been done for her -- she might just be r-slurred and genuinely think she's smarter than everyone she's ever met

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She certainly does, but that's common for DEI grifters. They just need to rephrase their thought process from 'I deserve everything I want' into 'we deserve everything we want'. They get their personal reparations, all criticism becomes about their minority group not them, all they have to do is never forget to use the royal we.

:#marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynoo#oticer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the average networth of single black woman in america is $5

I dont think they ever give it much thought

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bro this can't be true

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's honestly impressive how openly r-slurred she is, and proud of it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyshes#right:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, the rich sit on their wealth in gold coins like the dragon in The Hobbit.

:#soyreddittalking: :#chudsmugtalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

average upper middle class home https://media.giphy.com/media/qzeCF4ymrgFXy/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>how Redditors envision a person with a low six figure 401k

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

1. Invest money hoping that it turns into more money

2. Company hires profitable worker

3. Worker generates revenue for company

4. Capital is returned to investor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even I, stupid as I am, remember that bit from The Simpsons: "Money can be exchanged for goods and services". A business is doing well and would like to expand, but it hasn't enough money on its own to do that. It can borrow money from the banks, but if people come along and invest their money - that is, give money to the owners in exchange for a share of the business - this also works. Now the business can afford to hire on new people, expand its premises and make more goods to sell. Selling more things means more profit. Some of that profit goes to the investors, who can then decide to keep investing that money in other businesses.

Does this mean I'm smarter than a Pulitzer Prize winner?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

oh answer me then, which one has the greater multiplier effect, MPC or MPI?

she's right !commenters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"A liberal is a conservative who has been arrested."

Snapshots:

https://x.com/nhannahjones/status/1791919012500136016:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.