:soycry: :marseycope: M-more people voted against Trump than v-voted for him :soymad: :soyjaktantrum:

https://x.com/TristanSnell/status/1860106616005382603

								

								

That's called winning the popular vote.

Winning popular vote is meaningless if you don't also win electoral collage we have never elected via popular vote

What level of cope even is this? :marseycope:

"Trump WON the popular vote, first time a republican has won in two decades."

That's one way to say more Americans supported @HillaryClinton in 2016.

More weird :marseyseethe:

This makes no sense considering Trump crushed Kamala in a landslide victory.

Donald Trump's Mandate Is a Myth - cope article

Actually, he barely managed to win everything in America, chud. This proves he's not as popular as you claim :soyjakanimeglasses:

84
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He literally won 50 percent of the vote versus Momala's 48.4 percent what does this guy even mean by this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess the assumption is that there'll be at least a few more west coast votes to tip it under 50%.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's already below 50 %. 49.86 % atm including write-ins. Though it's 50.35 % when you add the RFK votes to the Trump tally

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe? But definitionally more people would still have voted for him percentage wise than Kamala, 99.1 percent of the vote is counted and she'll still be lagging behind

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah I get you. No I think his bit is that votes "against" is Kamala + Stein + Libertarians so as long as Trump doesn't stay above 50% he has more votes against. R-slurred claim either way (the people who voted Green probably voted more against the Dems than against Trump for example) but I think that's what he means.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yea its a cope. More people definitely by that logic voted against the Dems and Kamala than for them, but it helps him sleep at night i guess. What losing the popular vote does to a mfer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aren't these the same people who were yelling that a vote for a third party is a vote for Trump, you must vote for Harris or else? So by that logic, the RFK and Stein etc. votes should go to Trump, not be bundled in with Harris.

Votes 'against' Trump are also votes 'against' Harris, because the voters had the choice to vote for her and they didn't.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No he didn't! He only won 49.995%! That's less than 50!

:#soycrytalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's 49.8 % :marseyhmmhips: (including write-ins)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyakshually: AP is reporting 49.99 or 50.0 with 3 significant figures. If the site you linked otherwise lists 49.86, that rounds to 49.9.

https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2024/?office=P

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AP doesn't include write-ins I think

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He won more votes than her, so that's winning the popular vote. Even if he only had one vote more than her, he would have won it. There is no "you have to win by this amount to be declared popular vote winner" rule.

They just can't and won't accept that he won, and that more of the voting population of the country picked him than those who picked the Coconut Queen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.