And by that I mean the Rightoids are eating each other.
It all started when President Musk said Immigrants maybe werent so bad.
Naturally the Puppet from the Saw series(that happened to be blowing Dementia Daddy) chimed in
https://old.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/1hn4ps4/laura_loomer_has_had_it_with_elon/
Which led to Chuds being big mad
— Chief Trumpster (@ChiefTrumpster) December 27, 2024
Which being us to President Musk's austistic butt not backing down.
He speaks with such unearned authority that he does not have. He is not a politican. He's an insecure loser incel who works for Putin. God I hate this 3 year old XXL tub of rancid mayonnaise. I hope he pushes it until trumps ego implodes and he does something stupid so Putin has to intervene. They're all just Russian assets anyway.
Also
LOL 
Forget eggs, the price of popcorn is about to skyrocket, enjoy it Chads.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then stop worrying about H1Bs. The whole "nooo my labor should be super-expensive forever" hand-wringing is pathetic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Free market isn't very good at pricing in long term effects that are not very well understood. Hiring pajeets because they are half as productive but five times cheaper doesn't take into account technical debt they create on multiple levels and can lead to the boeingification of the entire industry.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Firms can internalize these risks so yes the free market will work fine here. This is just transparent "I know better than the stockholders" bullpooping, like DEI grifters who say that you need to hire obese black lesbians to be your programmers to have a non-toxic work environment.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did Boeing stockholders know better before the doors started falling off and their new space capsule failed on its first crewed flight?
You can't trust the free market to pressure a publicly traded company to act responsibly when there's an opportunity to cut costs now but maybe shit the bed 5-10 years later, when all real talent has left and technical debt became unmaintainable. And you should be especially worried when this is a result of a global regulatory change, with stockholders asking the CEO: "everyone is hiring pajeets now, why aren't you hiring pajeets?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"free market produced a single bad outcome, therefore free market bad"
Brainlet take. Is your response to the Boeing issue to say that the company should be nationalized? Regulated by Twitter/rdrama r-slurs?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The opposite, that it shouldn't have been fed the not-fixed-price government contracts. That shit with them and SpaceX developing space capsules was very funny btw, are you aware?
Anyway, that was an illustration, and not of "free market bad" but of "free market can fail" and should be managed with a firm and steady hand.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"free markets fail" does not come close to implying that "free markets should be managed with a firm and steady hand" - this is just Nirvana fallacy. And this context (h1b hiring) is a particularly spectacularly bad example to justify regulation, because you have obvious motivated reasoning from morons explaining why tech companies can't actually be trusted to hire employees properly. If a DEI grifter said that not having your 15% of your SWEs be obese black lesbians represented a "market failure" we would treat these words as some sort of magical argument-winning bullet, we would instead realize that this was just a convenient excuse from someone who doesn't actually have a vested interest in the success of the organizations that they're prescribing advice to.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, development of healthcare.gov was a market failure. Countless horror stories from the trenches represent market failures. It's not comparable to your strained analogy, when someone complains that 15% of coworkers are pajeets now which is bad because, it just is, okay? It's people complaining that cleaning shit up after pajeets takes more effort than if they wrote it themselves in the first place.
Then, we know that imperfect information is like the textbook cause of market failures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons and so on, and we can observe it at work here: ordinary programmers can grumble about pajeets over a beer all they want, but they won't do that where the upper management can overhear them, so the CEOs don't know, the stockholders don't know, nobody tells them because nobody wants to be called a racist and blacklisted from the industry.
So for example we have this funny situation right here, with all the shit that is being flung at Elon, somehow nobody says in the open that pajeet programmers suck. The elephant in the room is completely unmentioned. Your counter-argument, that firms are perfectly capable of taking into account long term effects of incompetent programmers, is your own invention because you have never seen it in the wild because nobody has called pajeet incompetence out in the first place.
So yeah, I'm not very optimistic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ordinary programmers literally can go and short companies that hire jeets, start competing jeet-free companies, etc. The idea that the market cannot convey this signal does not pass the laugh test, and arguments to the otherwise are literally the "am I out of touch? no it's the people who actually have direct financial incentives to be correct that are all wrong" Skinner meme.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Ah I see you're struggling with basic common sense. My bad, continue on r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Being a selfish, insecure frick isn't "common sense".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bro just learn to code and stop being so mad at people smarter than you. I'm not coming to your job smacking the broom out of your hand or messing up your clothing racks, chill.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I do know how to code. I'll be fine. Let the h1bs in to wash whiny Americans out of their overpriced jobs and make things better for everyone else.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BIPOC mentality
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
We all totally believe you, little buddy. Merry Christmas.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It should, though. What are you, a cuck?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context