https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889232914971295847
Democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 11, 2025
An activist judge is not a real judge. https://t.co/zRb398NyA0
Nowhere in our Constitution is a single federal judge given absolute power over the President or the people of the United States.
— Rep. Darrell Issa (@repdarrellissa) February 11, 2025
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
elmo again being an absolute gigaretard
the president is more of a figurehead than a decider. this is intentional as the united states is a republic not a dictatorship
he is nothing like a ceo, the judicial branch has sole and absolute power too rule executive orders unlawful as according too the law which the executive is bound too execute. they do not have the power too execute law, they just limit the execution of law, that is their main purpose.
bro hasn't read the damn constitution has he? they don't have absolute power. they can't tell a president what too do, they can only tell a president what not too do.
the judicial branch has fairly broad power too interpret law and tell the other branches too btfo, and that is by design
if u don't like it, u gotta get enough consensus too make a law by congress.
if the judicial is still telling u too btfo because constitution... then u gotta make an amendment, but we seem too have too lost the ability too do that, so tough on u
_____
I stand with Israel, and they will stand within the fucking us
@H ahahaha
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!sophistry who judges the judges
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I trust the DOGE zoomers to audit the Fed over the Fed itself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BIG BALLS!
i say all feds should have their AIM screen name or g*mer tag on their ID...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you aren't careful feds
will audit
your hard drive
bro ![:marseypedo: :marseypedo:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseypedo.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
BIG BALLS!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Inshallah
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The President appoints the judges he wants to be judged by.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The People!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Fedposters![:#marseypipebomb: :#marseypipebomb:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseypipebomb.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
1.Make Law
2. ACLU/Blue State/NGO sues to block law
3. Activist judge blocks law
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then it goes to the supreme court to see if Congress violated the Constitution
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
literally just said:
if the judicial is still telling u too btfo because constitution... then u gotta make an amendment
the us federal govt is intentionally a limited power govt, so the courts do have fairly broad power too tell others branch too btfo
_____
I stand with Israel, and they will stand within the fucking us
@H ahahaha
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
and thats a good thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The problem there is that the courts have already ruled the pres can in fact fire and hire with regards to federal agencies. Some picks have to be confirmed but overall, theres no basis for blocking the hires here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Huh maybe they can appeal it instead of being a b-word![:marseyhmmm: :marseyhmmm:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyhmmm.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They cant even justify why this had to be ex-parte instead of holding an actual hearing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
shut up chud lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So does that mean a conservative judge could have just blocked all 500 something executive orders biden did or what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They could have, and did block some (e.g., student loan gibs). Despite all of the screeching from the left, conservative Supreme Court justices do take their jobs seriously and make rulings based on constitutionality and precedent. They aren't going to let a conservative president do whatever tf he wants just because he appointed them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context