COMMUNITY NOTED
and Chuck Schumer 
upload TikTok 
videos of them saying the exact same thing 
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1896921836186964232
๐จ OH. MY. GOSH!
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 4, 2025
They gave Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren the *EXACT* same script. Was this a mistake?
Both of them fired off the EXACT same video on their social media today ahead of Trump's speech.
Word. For. Word.
Not only dishonest, but lazy! pic.twitter.com/RfmZv850Gs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
guys i think senior members of the democratic party are talking to each other and coordinating
is that legal?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They should have at least personalised it a little, otherwise there's no reason for them both to do it.
It's one of those things where it's fine if 1 or 100 people do it, but just a couple makes it look bad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well its up to 5 now.
95 to go. Come on dems we can do this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only five? You are like baby. Watch this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
look look we said "shit"...
whoa try not to cut me with all that edge...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Let's see how reddit and the leftists think about this exact issue
https://old.reddit.com/r/oddlyterrifying/comments/13akipf/a_collage_of_over_30_newscasters_from_various_us/
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/2/17189302/sinclair-broadcast-fake-news-biased-trump-viral-video
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats nothing new. I would have used the "this is dangerous to our democracy" collage instead, much more impactful. Nothing that strange about networks who all have same owner reading the script imhotep. But this is not bunch of networks and journ*lists, is it? Or if this is same, then begs the question, whos the owner?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
lmao this is sort of the problem the democrats still have, theyve circlejerked themselves into a tizzy...like who is the target for these videos? dem voters who already voted against trump? kamala didnt lose because of eggs, she lost because of the insane rhetoric coming from the left...trains everywhere, race relations, war, supporting hamas, crime, immigration...
MAGA voters dont care so much about eggs, just wanted trump to win...independents care about eggs, but it has also only been a month...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kamala 100% lost because people think the economy will be like in 2016 if trump is in power. You are in for a rude awakening come midterms, because lefties aren't going to ease up much on the rhetoric and trump will be slaughtered if the economy isn't fantastic which it obviously wont be since its a global issue. Incumbents in every single country on earth are losing this election cycle and it's not because of
s.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so you think no longer spending literal billions on USAID, DEI, etc. won't change a thing? I'm not even a megachud but it's obvious people's living standards were being lowered from shit they were paying for with no reason to it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literal piss in the bucket, the DOGE hasn't saved basically any money.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
piss in the bucket while the US can't afford to fix any infrastructure project
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's been literal weeks why isn't everything fixed yet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can't fix the budget by scrounging for pennies between the couch cushions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If they frick up auditing the pentagon then I'll agree with you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i just mean its more than just that...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Everyone cares about eggs but it won't effect elections unless it's not fixed by the time the next election happens.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you think the economy is going back to being even like decent in 1.5 years I want whatever you are huffing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Incumbents always lose the midterms. Obviously I'm referring to actual elections.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Maga supporters cared about the price of eggs but theyve been rising for three years and only just now have liberals cared to mention it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
theyre a private political party, chud. If you dont like it then start youre own
https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!goomblers !superheroes
@Spiderman 3rd Jackpot of the day!
!slots1234
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!slots1353
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots1353
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
it has to be a coincidence. there's no way they'd be so open about doing something this illegal!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Blatant conspiracy, RICO charges for sure
It's always RICO after all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's collusion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context