Unable to load image

:!siren: Gavin Newsom breaks with Democrats on trans athletes in sports : politics :siren:

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1j4vnfc/gavin_newsom_breaks_with_democrats_on_trans/

								

								

!chuds !transphobes :based:

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a pioneer for LGBTQ+ rights who decades ago upset leaders in his own party when he defied state law and issued marriage licenses to same-s*x couples, suggested Democrats were in the wrong in allowing transgender athletes to participate in female college and youth sports.

"I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness --- it's deeply unfair," Newsom said in his debut podcast episode of "This is Gavin Newsom." "I am not wrestling with the fairness issue. I totally agree with you."

Newsom's comments on the issue roiling political debates nationwide came in a conversation with influential MAGA-world figure Charlie Kirk, the campus culture warrior who leads the organization Turning Point USA and is a close ally of President Donald Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr.

Newsom also agreed that the most politically destructive attack ads from Trump's campaign featured Kamala Harris' support for providing taxpayer-funded gender transition-related medical care for detained immigrants and federal prisoners.

"She didn't even react to it, which was even more devastating," Newsom said, suggesting upward of 90 percent of Americans disagreed with Harris' position. "Then you had the video [of Harris] as a validator. Brutal," Newsom added. "It was a great ad."

Kirk challenged Newsom, a likely 2028 presidential hopeful, to speak out against AB Hernandez, a transgender high school track star from California whose triple jump event in the women's competition is drawing fierce backlash from the right. Newsom said he has four children of his own --- including two daughters --- and noted that both he and his wife participated in college-level sports, she in soccer and he in baseball.

"I revere sports, so the issue of fairness is completely legit," Newsom said. "And I saw that --- the last couple years, boy did I [see] how you guys were able to weaponize that issue at another level."

Kirk challenged Newsom over his use of the word "weaponize," and Newsom replaced it with "highlight."

POLITICO last month was first to report Newsom's new podcast, with the Democratic governor saying he drew inspiration from the likes of HBO provocateur Bill Maher, who regularly finds common ground with conservative adversaries while taking frequent aim at Democratic dogma, including on youth trans issues.

Newsom's interview with Kirk was friendly, sometimes exceedingly so. He mentioned the influence Kirk and other MAGA-world figures have had on his 13-year-old son, distanced himself from the use of pronouns and the gender-neutral term "Latinx," called police defunding "lunacy," denounced "cancel culture" and agreed that there had been some internal issues in the leadership of the Black Lives Matter organization.

Indeed, the 75-minute interview presented Newsom in the opposite light than he appeared in over recent years when stumping as a surrogate for former President Joe Biden and Harris and sparring with ideological foes like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Fox News' Sean Hannity.

Newsom in the podcast also was self-deprecating --- joking that he only eats meals (including grabbing take-out) at the famed three-Michelin star French Laundry where he got considerable heat for attending a friends' party during Covid lockdowns and conceding that he should have been celebrating at the everyman eatery Applebee's.

On youth trans sports Kirk drew out a longer response.

There are relatively few transgender athletes competing at the collegiate level. But Newsom said it was "easy to call out" the unfairness, echoing concerns raised by Republicans in Washington and across the country who argue that banning trans women and girls from participating in school athletic competitions designated for female athletes would ensure fairness.

While Newsom has at times touched on his own concerns about the issue, particularly around youth sports, the remarks on his eponymous new podcast are his most expansive on the topic. He went on to express sympathy for trans people, noting "these poor people" have higher rates of suicide and depression and saying "the way that people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that I have a hard time with, as well."

Yet, Newsom said Kirk was right when he contended that Republicans were capitalizing politically by painting Democrats as out of step with a strong majority of Americans on the issue. Earlier this week, Senate Democrats blocked a GOP-led effort to bar transgender girls from female youth sports.

"I agree with you," Newsom said. "We're getting crushed on it. Crushed. Crushed."

Newsom noted his own leadership on issues of LGBTQ+ rights but he said even some of his friends have privately asked him why he's not been more vocal about trans athletes.

He said the authority for trans K-12 athletes competing in girls' and womens' sports came from a 2014 state law --- signed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown --- that also allowed students who identified as transgender to use school bathrooms "consistent with their gender identity."

Newsom compared his position on trans athletes to conservatives who oppose same-s*x marriage on principle --- saying he values that Kirk and others are not abandoning their opposition now that gay marriages are both legally and socially acceptable by a majority of Americans.

141
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ita such a stupid hill to die on. There are like four trans athletes in the count

I hate this argument so much because this issue doesn't just affect the few trans people in sports, it affects every single legacy female athlete who now has to compete with them, have their records broken beyond hopes of recovery and, quite possibly, have their skulls broken by someone rocking a massive euphoria boner in the ring

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>just 4

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17412783165zGzXLf1OCgX4w.webp

!transphobes this is how handmaidens react to that fact lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>this is a debate

I'm gwoing two [fedpwost] hwowwy shit :#shyyt:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

Pretty sure this :marseyfrench: wearing degen is a man

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you link that report, qween?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:chadthanksqueencapy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its a stupid hill to die on for sure, but in the exact opposite way that these redditors think- the democratic party is tearing itself apart trying to appeal to a fricking handful of transgender people who are all gonna end up killing themselves anyways :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a stupid hill to die on for the opposite reason than they are arguing. If there are 4 trans athletes why do they even care about such a small minuscule number of them that they are willing to lose elections on.

If Reddit trains were pragmatic they would realize that them not being mentioned and getting Democrats elected is far better for them than shouting from the rooftops that they aren't going anywhere and getting a Republican elected as a result. But they are primarily ideologues with little idea of how realpolitiks actually work.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They have to stand firm on this, just like with not deadnaming killers, male feminists and Chrischan. Because to say 'trans women can't compete in women's sport' is to say 'trans women aren't women'. Same as 'trans people don't deserve to have their identity respected if they do something terrible'.

They are nothing but ideologues, as you can see whenever one of them or their supporters tries to put political success over :marseytrain: issues. They hate any suggestion of the truth: no, people don't see them as the opposite s*x, they never will, it's just a polite fiction they are doing to be kind and if you anger people enough they don't feel the need to be kind.

There's no pragmatism, they kick that out. There's only the endless attempt to keep their delusion going, and the hatred of things like this that irrefutably proves YWNBAW.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it's just four athletes then what's the problem with banning them? The ban would affect basically no one. :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I asked this and they immediately went on a screed that brought up immigrants and oppressing people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats the other reason the argument immediately falls apart

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ugh there's only like 1 or 2 active serial killers at a time, let people enjoy things!!!!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ah alright so lets ban those four from competing

noooo this is literal genocide

Also its a dumb argument BECAUSE IT LOST THEM AN ELECTION. So clearly address the issue instead of just thinking that not addressing it for the fifth time will magically make it go away

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.