Libtards have taken to running over children to own Drumf supporters

Intent.

If the lib had intentionally hit those two, then the chud he is arguing with is innocent because they are two seperate instances. The chud would be clear because the lib always intended on hitting the mom and daughter and the chud played no part in that decision.

However, the lib hit them accidentally. The chud was intentionally distracting the driver (illegal) and is therefore a party to the crime (hitting a mom and daughter by accident because the lib was distracted).

When you are driving, you are accountable for your actions while driving.

Chud is open to be procecuted for his involvement because he isn't a white women and therefore has agency in the eyes of the law (he will likely be hit with a lesser charge).

why would he be an accessory

"screaming and recording out your window when agitating other drivers, in transit, is not against any law"

I'm going to commit a felony murder if this stupid training restarts from the beginning because it's not loading the next module. Already submitted my timecard and they're like "you gotta do a 3 hour certification before next week"