[Rightoids Requested] Seriousposting about

Before you relegate me to libtard status, I hold some rightoid opinions. I think generally the government is obnoxiously bureaucratic and incompetent, taxes are being wasted on r-slurred bullshit. I think legal immigration is good but it seems very out of control at the border. I think that laws need to be fricking enforced way better than they are now. I think DEI/affirmative action is destroying the country and is one of the most r-slurred things we have come up with. These aren't the only positions I hold, and I do hold some left leaning ones, but I'm not part of the hivemind.

I know r-slurs on reddit (what does the r in rdrama stand for) talk about how trump is going to enact trans genocide and such. They are extremely mentally ill, and I understand how that would make you disregard everything else they say.

I know CNN and MSNBC said a lot of r-slurred shit about trump since 2016. The one I remember the thing that woke me up to how untrustworthy CNN was was something that I don't hear rightoids talk about a lot -- He went to feed koi with the Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan, they gave the koi food by the spoonful, Shinzo dumped his food box, and then Trump dumped his. CNN deceptively edited the video to hide the fact that Shinzo dumped his box first, making trump look like an r-slur. And for the full psy-op experience, they scrubbed it from their website making it incredibly difficult to find, and trying to search for it on google is difficult Full story at Fox News

What is funny is libs will go on about how right wing media focused on the fact that obama wore a tan suit, when the left wing media has several more of these on trump (ordering mcdonalds to the whitehouse, getting two scoops of ice cream). They also completely gloss over any real criticism of the obama administration, like Lois Lerner's abuse of the IRS to go after political opponents, and Eric Holder's mishandling of the DoJ.

The sexual harassment/defamation case in NY was obviously a political tool, and that woman is a dumb b-word who obviously just wanted the money.

So, I understand why you would disregard allegations that is going to overturn democracy, and then Jan 6 was a threat to our democracy. And I understand why you think all the court cases against him are political.

Let me say this -- the events of Jan 6 are literally the least relevant thing to the trump election story.

I return to my most poignant question: Why do you think Mike Pence will not endorse Trump? Do you think that Mike Pence is owned by the DNC? Or that the deep state got to him too?

I'm curious how informed you are about all the details surrounding the election, though. For example, the Georgia stuff -- how do you justify Trump literally calling and pressuring the Georgia Secretary of State to "find votes", and bringing up the fact that he was responsible for the Georgia governor's success? Is that not really fricking weird?

Why did the people that trump appointed tell him that there was no substantial evidence of election fraud, but he kept repeating those claims anyway?

Do you know that he submitted false electors (his lawyers prefer the term "alternate", but the legal backing for this seems completely r-slurred), in multiple states? I.e., submitting people into the electoral college and falsely claiming that they were representing that state?

Did you know that he asked Mike Pence to reject the electoral college vote? Why do you think Pence refused?

I'd recommend reading the Eastman memo -- it outlines an entire plan on how Trump could overturn the election