DODEHR/rDrama
Department of Drama Efficiency
E 15d ago#7946424
spent 0 currency on pings
they've been using them for almost a century
the old timey ones were mechanical devices and you loaded several pens and aligned your signature blocks to sign them all at once
but honestly what is the functional difference between holding a pen with your hand to put ink on paper, commanding a machine to hold a pen to put your signature on paper, or digitally signing a document? It's just a visual representation that you acknowledge and agree with the text of the document.
"ohh shit oh frick, the ink didn't actually excrete from your fingertip, you used a tube filled with ink to press against the paper! it's not a real signature!"
"ohhh frick the judge didn't strike the gavel, that means I'm not guilty!"
Eeeeeeee/eeeeeee
Imma sneak over like a spider and get sum of dat fat butt
DODE 15d ago#7946558
spent 0 currency on pings
I could understand it for signing autographs for your adoring fans or something but a device that signs the presidents signature on legal orders should be illegal. Why even leave room for conspiracies?
DODEHR/rDrama
Department of Drama Efficiency
E 15d ago#7946595
spent 0 currency on pings
signatures for the highest level of classified documents are done with no ink, all digital
I supposed the conspiracy would be that someone else used the autopen to forge the president's signature, which is a valid concern
but federal e-signatures use a physical authenticator, digital tokens and certifications, and encryption
I'd imagine that the autopen isn't just some loose device, and that it has layers of security built into it so it only signs things when the president authorizes its use
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao big if true
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So I looked it up. An auto pen is a a physical machine that just makes someone signature using a pen that is a replica of their signature.
Why would there be an auto pen for the presidents signature? That seems like it's asking for controversy
Putting the
in
spookieturkeymerrynew yeardonkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
they've been using them for almost a century
the old timey ones were mechanical devices and you loaded several pens and aligned your signature blocks to sign them all at once
but honestly what is the functional difference between holding a pen with your hand to put ink on paper, commanding a machine to hold a pen to put your signature on paper, or digitally signing a document? It's just a visual representation that you acknowledge and agree with the text of the document.
"ohh shit oh frick, the ink didn't actually excrete from your fingertip, you used a tube filled with ink to press against the paper! it's not a real signature!"
"ohhh frick the judge didn't strike the gavel, that means I'm not guilty!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I could understand it for signing autographs for your adoring fans or something but a device that signs the presidents signature on legal orders should be illegal. Why even leave room for conspiracies?
Putting the
in
spookieturkeymerrynew yeardonkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
signatures for the highest level of classified documents are done with no ink, all digital
I supposed the conspiracy would be that someone else used the autopen to forge the president's signature, which is a valid concern
but federal e-signatures use a physical authenticator, digital tokens and certifications, and encryption
I'd imagine that the autopen isn't just some loose device, and that it has layers of security built into it so it only signs things when the president authorizes its use
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is literally what the president and his merry band of r-slurs are alleging
Putting the
in
spookieturkeymerrynew yeardonkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Based and correct. If you're going to be a puppet president you have to at least sign your benefactors' orders with an actual pen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
so trump doesn't use an autopen?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you tell people your vote it won't come true
Snapshots:
https://www.allsides.com/story/donald-trump-trump-says-biden-pardons-signed-autopen-are-void:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context