Executive order:
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Background. Global law firms have for years played an outsized role in undermining the judicial process and in the destruction of bedrock American principles. Many have engaged in activities that make our > communities less safe, increase burdens on local businesses, limit constitutional freedoms, and degrade the quality of American elections. Additionally, they have sometimes done so on behalf of clients, pro bono, or ostensibly "for the public good" — potentially depriving those who cannot otherwise afford the benefit of top legal talent the access to justice deserved by all. My Administration will no longer support taxpayer funds sponsoring such harm.
My Administration has already taken action to address some of the significant risks and egregious conduct associated with law firms, and I have determined that similar action is necessary to end Government sponsorship of harmful activity by an additional law firm: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (Paul Weiss). In 2021, a Paul Weiss partner and former leading prosecutor in the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller brought a pro bono suit against individuals alleged to have participated in the events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, on behalf of the District of Columbia Attorney General.
In 2022, Paul Weiss hired unethical attorney Mark Pomerantz, who had previously left Paul Weiss to join the Manhattan District Attorney's office solely to manufacture a prosecution against me and who, according to his co-workers, unethically led witnesses in ways designed to implicate me. After being unable to convince even Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg that a fraud case was feasible, Pomerantz engaged in a media campaign to gin up support for this unwarranted prosecution.
Additionally, Paul Weiss discriminates against its own employees on the basis of race and other categories prohibited by civil rights laws. Paul Weiss, along with nearly every other large, influential, or industry leading law firm, makes decisions around "targets" based on race and s*x. My Administration is committed to ending such unlawful discrimination perpetrated in the name of "diversity, equity, and inclusion" policies and ensuring that Federal benefits support the laws and policies of the United States, including those laws and policies promoting our national security and respecting the democratic process. Those who engage in blatant discrimination and other activities inconsistent with the interests of the United States should not have access to our Nation's secrets nor be deemed responsible stewards of any Federal funds.
...
TL;DR: They prosecuted Jan 6 rioters and hired someone who tried to prosectute , thus they should have their security clearances revoked. But they're good if they start doing it for my administration.
Note that DDR tried this with a different firm and had it blocked (for now) by a Judge: https://www.npr.org/2025/03/12/g-s1-53422/judge-blocks-trump-law-firm
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump's entire first two months has been an exercise in "you take a shot at the king you better not miss."
I never saw the EO/blocking of the government's use of Perkins Coie. I remember that firm had it's fingerprints all over Russiagate and represents darn near every democrat politician that gets in legal trouble. Someone's gonna have to explain to me how banning the govt from using govt funds to retain that firm violates their rights.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's for the public good sweaty, the government can't withhold money for the public good it says so in the delarcration of Independence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh okay!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
you guys dont have public tenders?
can your gov just use money to whichever private company at any price?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context