Post an unpopular opinion ITT. Whichever comment is most unpopular gets 1000 MBux.
If you agree with an opinion, upmarsey it. If you disagree, downmarsey it. I'll make a poll with the top few options, then whoever wins that poll will be the winner.
!chuds !nonchuds !downmarseyrs get in here
Let the begin
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Blacks are the only legitimately opressed class in the USA
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What about ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nope. They had all the chance in the world, many chances and opportunities not afforded to the black (literal autonomous city states anyone?)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!jannies this CHUD is saying native americans aren't oppressed!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Read "a fate worse than death" relocations and reservations were the nicest possible solution, the alternatives would have all been variations of genocide.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They did get genocided. Unironically. Not like Israel's modern day genocide-lite "oh we're murdering thousands of your children" but actually entire peoples and cultures were wiped off the map.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean yeah if you wanna water down genocide, sure totes genocided.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you don't count what happened to indigenous people in America I don't know how you could ever count anything as genocide. In your mind, has there ever been a genocide?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think, at least from a normo perspective, there has do be a religious or political spark for genocide to be a thing. Otherwise it's just a massacre. Kinda like how if I yell the n word before shooting it becomes a hate crime
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There was for sure a religious/political drive for forced conversion They would take native kids away from their families, and force them to abandon their own language, religion and culture. And this was in the more "enlightened" 20th century once they'd stopped just flat-out killing them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why do you qualify a loss of culture/language/etc a genocide? Doesn't that make genocide quite the nebulous concept vs a hard and fast concept? I'm asking in good faith btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Plenty, but letting people assimilate while tard wrangling those who can't or won't is hardly genocide. Slaveowning, torture, raids, and r*pe aren't valid cultural norms and the entire American civil war was centered around the first. The impetus for conflicts between America and the various tribes of American Indian are the all on that list.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
soz for the Aztecs, I guess.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No it's not genocide if you don't kill the generation. If you expand a word that has a clear definition until it's so broad that there are thousands cooccuring and some that have been going on for many many generations, all thats left for you to do is put on your clown makeup.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context