https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1714535687070916987#m
windows still in tact
fire after impact
video showing the 200 500 800 bodies
https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1714535687070916987#m
windows still in tact
fire after impact
video showing the 200 500 800 bodies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so whodunnit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Looks like it was a misfired rocket from somewhere in Palestine, an Israeli missile would have made a crater, caused more damage, and would have caused all glass in the immediate area to shatter completely. All the damage looks like it was done by fire not an explosion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Have you seen the damage to the dead kids? It's not burns.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's obviously talking about the structural damage, not the exploded fricking people you r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What is the difference, dumbshit? When there's a plane crash where bombing is suspected, the bodies of the victims are one of the key pieces of evidence. Why don't they matter here?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Obviously both Hamas and Israeli missiles can explode people in its immediate vicinity why are you acting as if someone has said otherwise? He suggested the difference is an Israeli strike would have caused more widespread structural damage. It's really simple.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The obvious resolution is for israel to bomb the same spot so we can compare the damage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The IDF's whole argument is that the damage was done by fire from burning rocket fuel, not just explosives. Can you please at least learn the talking points of who you're trying to shill for?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nobody is saying there was no explosion. There can be both an explosion and a subsequent fire.
Look, I don't know for sure if it was an Israeli strike or a Hamas missile or something else but what you're saying is a total strawman of the argument. You're refusing to even engage the actual point which is a basic analysis of the state of the area in the daylight aftermath photos and video. Ie, the damage to the environment is minimal and appears to be largely caused by fire or to put it another way it appears to be the scene of a fatal but relatively small explosion which caused a fire. The argument is thus "if it were an Israeli strike the damage would look different".
This is what an Israeli air strike looks like (no visible death):
Now look back at the hospital photograph. Does that look like the aftermath of what you just watched?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, this is why I keep saying that the fire indicates it was a rocket. But there had to be a very powerful explosion to kill that many people. So what gives? Maybe there weren't really 200 killed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Omg they have rockets that behead babies now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm unironically not sure if you're serious and really don't know how bombs work after interacting with some users here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yes obviously thats the case, and they are lying about the casualties
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think we all know...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're trying to get us to destroy each other so they can move in.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade back in my boomer times with precision weapons because the maps were wrong. Israelis make this kind of mistake all the time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao wasnt that just an excuse. I thought they bombed it cos the chinks were trying to buy the f117 wreckage
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's not fair to ask us to pass up an opportunity to bomb the serbs and chinese at the same time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The one alternate theory I've heard from someone reputable is that the Serbs had a radio station there sending orders to their military, which would have made it a completely legit target.
The F117 wreckage was gonna get sold no matter what. And it was probably getting obsolete.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That was 25 years ago, these days google maps knows when a roundabout in mongolia has construction work going on.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You greatly underestimate how tarded people can be when following bureaucratic procedures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I know how tarded they can be, it's certainly possible, but I trust israeli precision strikes orders of magnitude more than gazan missiles made out of shit they find in trashcans.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How many bombs did Israel throw at Gaza and what's the average fail rate of their bombs ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
idk but i'm sure JIDF will tell us
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context