Comments:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36030969
https://archived.moe/g/thread/93632944/linux-graphics-stack-is-trans (EDIT: removed/jannied, archive: https://archived.moe/g/thread/93632944/)
HN users are noticing something:
« I’m on the board overseeing Linux graphics. Half of us are trans »
From a purely statistical POV, this is absurdly bizarre.
Not really.
Statistically there will be weird coincidences completely naturally. It's also quite arbitrary which we see as meaningful. If say, Linux networking has unusually many people called "John" that probably will be unnoticed because nobody pays that much attention to common, unremarkable names. If they all randomly turn out to have green eyes, then that's more visible. It's completely subjective which of those is more remarkable.
There are also likely social effects -- people stick together, and some side interests align with some fields. Eg, I think it's reasonable to guess there's going to be more furries than average in VR development. Part because VR allow you to look like whatever you want a lot of the time, part because people will invite their friends in.
It is not just a random coincidence. It's a phenomenon more broadly across programming, especially very low-level/hardware stuff.
There does seem to be a correlation between autism spectrum and gender confusion, with the former often present in individuals who are into highly technical pursuits.
The logic seems to be not conforming to masculine stereotypes ==> must be a woman.
It's not "gender confusion". They know very well who they are. You are confused about the topic.
Meanwhile on /g/:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Friendly reminder that trans people are at least three times more likely to be diagnosed with autism as the general population.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only 3x? I'd have guessed like 20x
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
4x for MTF if you go by https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/autism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Neurodivergents are easy to groom
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Easy to goon.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Easy to
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I would have guessed more like 300x.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well I got my number from a quick Google search and the top result was an NPR article that says three to six.
If fricking NPR says 3x I'd say it's likely much higher.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
my guess is 6-8x
Part of the fiscally-left, socially-right movement. Join today!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah, tack an extra zero on that figure at least.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
the difference is capped, for example lets say 2% of the general population is neurodivergent, then it's impossible for any group to be more than 50 times that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's 6x.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context