"Critical Code Studies" - Postmodern Social Justice meets Code

https://twitter.com/y_h_j_e_t/status/1662817736366383106

Just lol

123
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Final :marseyredmage: Verdict: Full of Gems

Yet, somehow, I cant help but wonder :marseysphinx: if slower is not sometimes better? (Humanities folk can afford to ask such questions.) Could there :marseycheerup: not be algorithms that do a better :marseysaulgoodman: job by including more processing :marseyunresponsive: cycles? Such a naive :marseyinnocent: question, I know.

:marseyfacepalm: Yes let's run useless blocks :marseyminer: of code so that r-slurs can feel included.

Interpretation, at the start of the twenty-first century, is not that search :marseyprostateexam: for what the author :marseyshakespeare: secretly meant, that bizarre scavenger hunt that computer :marseylaptopkrayon2: scientists probably recall from their Ms. Finetooths midterm essay questions.

This interpretation of a code as a cultural text, therefore, grows out of a very different analysis than the close :marseynoyouzoom: examination of a lyric poem that seeks to answer :marseyconfuseddead: some riddle :marseysphinx: hidden in the text by the author.

:!marseyretard2: Fails to understand words :marseylongpost: can have multiple meanings...

I suggested Quicksort as a metaphor for social :marseysjw: organization in communities, drawing :marseybadnews: out an analogy for the way a neighborhood street :marseypajeet: or even highway may serve :marseywithcake: to divide and conquer :marseyconquistador: a demographic.

This one does not warrant a response.

The static main basically is a mistake. It just confuses newbies and they tend to write :marseychudnotes: programs with static variables methods only.

Singletons are a right :marseytransmisiaaward: of passage :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yet, somehow, I cant help but wonder if slower is not sometimes better? (Humanities folk can afford to ask such questions.) Could there not be algorithms that do a better job by including more processing cycles? Such a naive question, I know.

It's called an anytime algorithm and anyone with a first-year undergrad knowledge of algorithms and complexity would know this. That said, it's only relevant for algorithms that find approximate solutions, rather than exact ones.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The static main basically is a mistake. It just confuses newbies and they tend to write :marseychingchongnotes: programs with static variables methods only.

okay? then maybe they shouldn't do that???

it's like saying a hammer :marseyrevolution: is bad because sometimes people hit their nuts with it. maybe the problem is the nut hitters, not the hammer :marseyjudge: itself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.