Unable to load image

Inclusivity Fix (New Contributor) · Issue #3322 · philc/vimium · GitHub (2016)

https://github.com/philc/vimium/issues/3322

>:marseysoyjak: As part of an open source class assignment a group evaluated your project from the perspective of a novice/new contributor. This is part of an OSS gender inclusive initiative. There were several facets to this persona that led us to suggest a fix (please see persona attached). Before creating a PR i wanted to start the conversion on whether this fix is wanted/granted. The fix would be a simple cleanup of the README.md, moving the release notes section to a separate file and linking to that in the README.

They have captured and instrumentalized even engineering degrees to "pay" people to shill their ideology online. The dev just ignored and got away with it, but stuff like this would make me nervous if my real name is behind the project as this has a small chance of blowing up.

Am I overreacting at sneeding at tactics like these? And how would you react?

46
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We need more Linus types so students and beginners start fearing PRs again.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironically impossible unless we get more Linus tier programmers, and even then the problem is they'll all be trans and accept this kind of shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Perfect for gorgeous looks, can push asap . Verify the pull request and merge asap

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

honestly if jeets would've used woke rhetoric during hacktoberfest then nobody would dare sneed publically about it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't understand what's going on here. It's an open source project, why is somebody asking permission and sumbitting a bio to make a PR? Just make it, that's the whole point. If they don't like the "fix" they just won't approve it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's part of their exercise, the bio is not real. It's a "persona", a tool used by marketing people to make an avatar for categories of clients. For rdrama you'd have "Eric Chang, the incel chud" or "Jade Simmons, the girl who cut her peepee off" and you'd make up their whole personality and hobbies, like fan-fiction.

And supposedly this serves as documentation for your marketing and design teams to better serve the needs of those clients by thinking about things from their perspective.

So here this guy is saying, "I invented this woman who I imagine is your stereotypical user, and made these changes to your readme to make it more adapted to her personality." And this is of course because he is a useless frick who can't write code so the useless teacher has to make up bullshit exercises to make them feel like they're participating in the open source process.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes with the slight addendum that this personas are not for marketing but for DEI "people". They lifted it 1 to 1 from https://gendermag.org/foundations.php , whose premise seems to be that women are underrepresented in tech partly because learning materials are catered to men.

My own peer review of the site found this small amusing bit:

>Computer Self-Efficacy : : Pat has medium computer self-efficacy about doing unfamiliar computing tasks. If problems arise with their technology, Pat will keep on trying to figure out how to achieve what they have set out to do for quite awhile; Pat doesn't give up right away when computers or technology present a challenge to them.

Source? You got a source for that? :sciencejak: Yes:

[Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 17, 19, 22, 27, 28, 32, 34, 38]

Where [1] is:

[1] Markus Appel, Nicole Kronberger and Joshua Aronson. 2011. Stereotype threat impairs ability building: Effects on test preparation among women in science and technology, European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 904-913.

While I strongly suspect stereotype threat is just an artifact on the replication crisis, from my understanding about the alleged effect I fail to see how this is at all relevant to this trait of Pat or TIm or whatever, let alone a source

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ooof big :marseyautism: moment from me because I somehow missed all of that, and it's way worse than I could have imagined

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You'd create a pr without consent?

:soycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I understand not wanting to waste your time on work that is going to get rejected, but they already did the work for their class, making the PR would at most be 5 clicks and would've just been approved since their change is much more informative than whatever gibberish they wrote there

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Issue Closed: Does not follow the guidelines for submitting issues.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironically yes. The maintainer implemented their changed later, but because their text was so bloated and didn't mention what trivial change they actually implemented, he never bothered reading it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao this is identical to sexy Indian dude "Fix README.md stylings for Good Lookings" pull requests, down to the broken english "i wanted to start the conversion on whether this fix is wanted/granted." :marseypaintretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Around one years later, the maintainer finally saw the wisdom of their PR and actually implemented it himself:

PR (that never got submitted): https://github.com/JonathanGrocott/vimium/commit/ad8c8e15353d30072af2a57e8da75427c2ea5ada

Real commit https://github.com/philc/vimium/commit/ab3c49d187478b1dddb11e55cd3e248bb2263cc1

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the changes were clearly generated by either a bot or find/replace, just say:

We do not accept bot or generated contributions

and if they do this more than once, call them a spammer and block them. Put this in CONTRIBUTING.md to deter many of the spammers.

This will generally get you off the hook from having to deal with anonymous “diversity” spammers, and it's not even incorrect (Sexy Indian dudes will very commonly do this when trying to boost their stats or seek out bug bounties). If they argue back, then depending on whether or not your real name is tied to the account, then you should either pre-emptively block them or try to generate drama for rdrama.net to aggregate.

Doesn't work for handling regular contributors to the repository (or your own organization's contributors), though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can get out of these by acting like you don't know what they're talking about for a few weeks and then pivoting to endless change requests sent three days after the latest revision

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The DLang way @iStillMissEd

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I <3 D

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My argument is similar in the sense that schools aren't gun free but Gatling gun free.

Snapshots:

README.md:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.