In case you wanted to trust Scroogle and the US Government even less!
Federal investigators have ordered Google to provide information on all viewers of select YouTube videos, according to multiple court orders obtained by Forbes. Privacy experts from multiple civil rights groups told Forbes they think the orders are unconstitutional because they threaten to turn innocent YouTube viewers into criminal suspects.In a just-unsealed case from Kentucky reviewed by Forbes, undercover cops sought to identify the individual behind the online moniker “elonmuskwhm,” who they suspect of selling bitcoin for cash, potentially running afoul of money laundering laws and rules around unlicensed money transmitting.
In conversations with the user in early January, undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos, which collectively have been watched over 30,000 times.
The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023. The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos. The cops argued, “There is reason to believe that these records would be relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation, including by providing identification information about the perpetrators.”......
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's legal to bait people. Feds are trolls just like us.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yet we do it for free.
And we pay them to do it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Fed employment ads on rDrama when?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The future haha
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
only to an extent, if they push that too far its entrapment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
entrapment is a cope and basically nobody gets off on it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I get off on it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The standard for entrapment is pretty strict. A defendant must show that they wouldn't have committed the crime without the circumstances created by the artificial setup that agents established.
Agents generally do setups that meet this standard. Some techniques I've seen include "bait," where they make a crime convenient and tempting but otherwise just watch. Another technique is, if they interact with someone, they usually try to not drive everything, leaving room for the perp to ask for something clearly illegal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
May as well try to prove that demand curves don't slope downward.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean, yeah, and that's kind of my point. It's really hard to succeed with an entrapment affirmative defense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
BIPOC you are a fed who do you think you're kidding
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context