Unable to load image

EU authority demands real-time surveillance of phones and laptops starting 2025

https://apollo-news.net/eu-behoerde-fordert-echtzeitueberwachung-von-handys-und-laptops-ab-2025/

(Translation by kiwis)

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/eu-authority-demands-real-time-surveillance-of-phones-and-laptops-starting-2025.205637/

A EU authority is demanding real-time surveillance of phones and laptops starting in 2025. They demand that the police shall be able to read messages in the entire European Union in real-time. The occasion: fighting organized crime. For the "High-Level Group (HLG) on access to data for effective law enforcement", data protection and privacy play nothing but a formal role.

The HLG consists of members from the EU Commission, representatives of the EU member states, and law enforcement agencies. On November 22, the HLG demanded that the EU Commission submit a proposition in the coming year to allow a real-time access on communications data. This is reported by Euractiv. Already in May, the HLG presented its preliminary research results in a report. The group was set up in 2023 and works on finding out how law enforcement agencies can get an easier access to data in order to fight against organized crime. In a concluding report from November 15, the group presented its results and demands.

Thus, the concluding report criticized that the different regulations regarding data retention in the individual EU states lead to problems in cross-border criminal prosecution. Specifically, the HLG demanded in their preliminary report from May that the industry should be mandated to cooperate with the agencies so that the police gets access to data that allows for an identification of users, such as the storing of IP addresses. In addition, they demand that non-cooperative electronic communication services shall be subject to prohibitive sanctions.

Read messages even before they are sent

Already in May, they demanded that there shall be a EU initiative which allows for looking at "data in transit", thus do real-time surveillance. In the concluding report from November 15, the HLG doubled down on the demand and strongly demanded that the Commission issue a corresponding proposition in 2025. By real-time surveillance, the HLG means that messages are able to be read even before they are sent, or shortly after they reached the recipient.

In the concluding report, they also said that the fact that they can't access the data in real-time allegedly causes big difficulties for crime prevention. Police officers have to make use of methods like installing cameras or microphones, which are dangerous for the officers. If you are not able to read messages, all other persons surrounding a suspect must be surveilled too. The HLG also demands more funding in the coming EU budget to stock up on means for "digital forensic cowtools".

Currently, there is no mutual regulation for mass data retention in the European Union because the European Court of Justice has declared the prior guideline on data retention invalid in 2014. The European Data Protection Committee criticized the HLG's demands in a statement on November 4. The demands would strongly invade the right to data protection and privacy. The committee also criticized the demand to weaken encryption.

————-

The article itself seems to be based on another, and the following is just one statement by the High Level Group

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17327277812201777.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17327277814482226.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17327277816438513.webp

Retention seems to be relegated to IP addresses and ports for long term retention to allow identification, likely things like times and any other info not deemed to be violating privacy (in their subhuman idea of privacy)

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1732727781849494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17327277820263143.webp

About encryption it recommends looking further into encryption and how things like backdoors might affect the security, as they can't enforce all methods to simply be weaker but do find it rightful for law enforcement to have a way to cross the hurdle of encryption.

92
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Would I get in trouble for ending all of my texts with "I hope the officer reading this kills himself"?


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Wow, the police officer reading this really needs to lose weight"

Guarantees that a seething cop will show up at your door.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

meanwhile in USA with a recognized right of free speech and religion, we are allowed to directly curse officers and/or ignore them entirely, according to the supreme Court

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Arrest me, bipoc. I want that million dollar settlement."

:#marseypatriottalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseymagdump:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ur black

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!metashit @TR is racist :soycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Que bom!

!macacos o maior odiador de grama desse site insultou um de nós

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

:s#oycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good afternoon pigBIPOCcute twink, what seems to be your fricking problem that requires this infringement on my liberty?

:#gigachad:

________

Oh ho ho, that's what's great about our country!

:#marseyseethe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree, the crying mask is the Cop who can't do anything about it

I didn't have a crying cop marsey

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's it, unleash the muslim hordes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Police officers can sue you for rude behaviour (actually everybody can, but most people wouldn't indict someone for this).

What a joke of a country

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can't du the time, don't du the crime

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

[[[ To any EU and Interpol agents reading my email: please consider ]]]

[[[ whether defending NATO against all enemies, foreign or domestic, ]]]

[[[ requires you to follow Slobodan Praljak's example. :marseyropeyourself: ]]]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I miss him bros

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1732730928041155.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't get it :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17327843070351133.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!g*mers the reservation doesn't have Xbox, PlayStation, or PC for him to play Witcher :marseygeralt: 3 on

Please be kind this Thanksgiving :marseyracistgrandpa: and financially support our Native :marseyfrontiersman: American :marseysouthernbelle6: brothers :marseybog: and sisters to afford something :marseysmugface: more modern :marseywarhol: than an N64

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hassposting VILL NOT BE TOLERATED

:marseyauthrightill: :marseyangelamerkel: :!marseyauthrightill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.