![Emoji Award given by @inuyasha: "marseytunaktunakinvasion" Emoji Award given by @inuyasha: "marseytunaktunakinvasion"](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseytunaktunakinvasion.webp)
![Emoji Award given by @inuyasha: "marseytunaktunakinvasion" Emoji Award given by @inuyasha: "marseytunaktunakinvasion"](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseytunaktunakinvasion.webp)
![](https://i.rdrama.net/images/17005094067930994r.webp)
Google Kills Diversity Hiring Targets
- 51
- 85
Now playing: Busted Bayou (Tropical Freeze).mp3
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
![](https://i.rdrama.net/images/163936841726r.webp)
![USA - Show off your America pride!](https://i.rdrama.net/i/hats/USA.webp?h=10)
Current Registered Users: 30,841
![sidebar image](https://i.rdrama.net/images/1709438399604303.webp)
tech/science swag.
Guidelines:
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good slackers would find interesting. That includes more than /g/ memes and slacking off. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual laziness.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably lame.
Help keep this hole healthy by keeping drama and NOT drama balanced. If you see too much drama, post something that isn't dramatic. If there isn't enough drama and this hole has become too boring, POST DRAMA!
In Submissions
Please do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It should be explicit in submitting something that you think it's important.
Please don't submit the original source. If the article is behind a paywall, just post the text. If a video is behind a paywall, post a magnet link. Fuck journos.
Please don't ruin the hole with chudposts. It isn't funny and doesn't belong here. THEY WILL BE MOVED TO /H/CHUDRAMA
If the title includes the name of the site, please leave that in, because our users are too stupid to know the difference between a url and a search query.
If you submit a video or pdf, please don't warn us by appending [video] or [pdf] to the title. That would be r-slurred. We're not using text-based browsers. We know what videos and pdfs are.
Make sure the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective. Good clickbait titles are like "Top 10 Ways to do X" or "Don't do these 4 things if you want X"
Otherwise editorialize. Please don't use the original title, unless it is gay or r-slurred, or you're shits all fucked up.
If you're going to post old news (at least 1 year old), please flair it so we can mock you for living under a rock, or don't and we'll mock you anyway.
Please don't post on SN to ask or tell us something. Send it to [email protected] instead.
If your post doesn't get enough traction, try to delete and repost it.
Please don't use SN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff occasionally, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. If you want to astroturf or advertise, post on news.ycombinator.com instead.
Please solicit upvotes, comments, and submissions. Users are stupid and need to reminded to vote and interact. Thanks for the gold, kind stranger, upvotes to the left.
In Comments
Be snarky. Don't be kind. Have fun banter; don't be a dork. Please don't use big words like "fulminate". Please sneed at the rest of the community.
Comments should get more enlightened and centrist, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If disagreeing, please reply to the argument and call them names. "1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be improved to "1 + 1 is 3, not 2, mathfaggot"
Please respond to the weakest plausible strawman of what someone says, not a stronger one that's harder to make fun of. Assume that they are bad faith actors.
Eschew jailbait. Paedophiles will be thrown in a wood chipper, as pertained by sitewide rules.
Please post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. All press is good press.
Please use Slacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples weak ideologies.
Please comment on whether someone read an article. If you don't read the article, you are a cute twink.
Please pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Don't nitpick stupid crap.
Please don't be an unfunny chud. Nobody cares about your opinion of X Unrelated Topic in Y Unrelated Thread. If you're the type of loser that belongs on /h/chudrama, we may exile you.
Sockpuppet accounts are encouraged, but please don't farm dramakarma.
Please use uppercase for emphasis.
Please post deranged conspiracy theories about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and dang will add you to their spam list.
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, report it and our moderators will probably do nothing about it. Feed egregious comments by replying instead of flagging them like a pussy. Remember: If you flag, you're a cute twink.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. That's too boring, even for HN users.
Please seethe about how your posts don't get enough upvotes.
Please don't post comments saying that rdrama is turning into ruqqus. It's a nazi dogwhistle, as old as the hills.
Miscellaneous:
The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality or funny effortposts and informative or entertaining comments. Please refrain from posting the following:
Boring wingcucked nonsense nobody cares about that belongs in chudrama
Normie shit everyone already knows about
Anything that doesn't gratifify one's intellectual laziness
Bimothy-tier posts
Anything that the jannies don't like
Jannies reserve the right to exile baby ducks from this hole at any time.
We reserve the right to exile you for whatever reason we want, even for no reason at all! We also reserve the right to change the guidelines at any time, so be sure to read them at least once a month. We also reserve the right to ignore enforcement of the guidelines at the discretion of the janitorial staff. This hole is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies and loser nerds who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
/h/slackernews SETTINGS /h/slackernews MODS /h/slackernews LOG /h/slackernews EXILEES /h/slackernews FOLLOWERS /h/slackernews BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I worked at Google for a bit and saw this firsthand.
Quick recap on how hiring works there: the candidate goes through a series of around 5 or 6 interviews, and interviewers immediately do a short writeup of how it went, and if the short feedbacks are looking good, you write a fuller writeup. These take 30-60 min to do properly. Interview questions come from a question bank with objective criteria for how well the candidate did; in the writeups, you're not allowed to mention anything identifying the candidate's demographics (for pronouns, you're supposed to use TC for the candidate). All of them go to a hiring committee who gives the thumbs up or down depending on the feedback.
So, one day, I get this interview for a black candidate who's some kind of testing engineer for some contractor out in DC. TC gets literally no points on the interview; TC can't even write a for loop. Once it's done, I write up my short feedback and submit it.
Half an hour later, I get a message from the recruiter. He wants me to revise my scoring, and gives me a hard time about it, saying TC deserved more credit than I gave TC. This has literally never happened to me before. I refuse, and then we go to full feedback anyway. I'm like, okay, maybe TC did badly just on my interview, although I'm grumpy at having to exhaustively document how not being able to write the most basic code is a reason not to hire.
The next week, TC gets rejected by the hiring committee, and we get to see all the interviewers' feedback. And... Every single interviewer gave TC the lowest possible scores. Strong No Hire (SNH). (Except for the behavioral interview, where the questions are supposed to evaluate leadership and character and Googliness, where TC got top scores.) Usually, in situations like this TC wouldn't even get close to being reviewed by the actual hiring committee. And despite it all, TC did.
In the end, the process still reached the correct outcome, but there was obviously a very big thumb being pressed on the scale.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've been in the same position but on top of that all the CVs get filtered by HR women before they are even sent to us, so at the very first stage where people who know anything about the work get to look at the options, we've already had 90% of the white guys thrown out and every single black or foid left in regardless of competence. Then you get a stern talking to if your selections don't include both a black person and a woman, even if the only black and female candidates completely flunked the practical test (doesn't matter, they'll get max scores in the face-to-face regardless because every hiring manager nuts their pants when they see a minority)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
SNH definitely means Strong Not Hung
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Seek help.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context