- 8
- 33
A few days ago I noticed that when I play on Linux (Ubuntu or Manjaro) the image quality is lower than when I play on Windows. So I decided to do a test using the Edge browser with the User-Agent Switcher and Manager extension changing the user-agent for Windows 10 with Edge 103 on my Manjaro. As incredible as it may seem, the quality was much higher, getting the same quality as Windows without Clarity Boost turned on.
User-agent configuration
Image without changing user-agent (Linux)
Image after switching user-agent to Windows
I don't know how much the images lose quality when posting, but you can notice a big difference especially in the writing that in Linux without changing user-agent is very blurry.
- 5
- 13
Mastodonger going mental as usual. Pleroma is "currently" the most completed and efficient backend for the Fediverse
I don't mention Pleroma or Soapbox because of the toxic culture behind them.
Pleroma's website promotes instances that many other instances have had to block due to lack of moderation.
These instances are mainly just "shitposter.club", which is a fun instance
The Fediverse shouldn't just be about software, it should also be about reducing toxicity. That's the reason I left Facebook, Twitter etc and came here, to get away from toxicity.
go back to twitter
The Fedi is very protective of trans people, and many of the people who created the Fedi are trans.
Not even true, Gargron (mastodon) isn't trans, Misskey developer isn't trans, Pleroma dev definitely isn't trans, Soapbox dev is transphobic.
The activitypub standard which connects the fediverse together was co-written by a trans person.
Also Mastodon changed its branding from "corporation" blue to "purple" lmao
- 8
- 30
https://old.reddit.com/r/CatholicDating/comments/m083cy/artificial_intelligence_that_checks_how/
Access to your camera is necessary, but no personal data is collected.
Can someone with Windows spoof your webcam using Manycam or something using this video
- 53
- 51
Least butthurt GNOME dev discovers a violation of the GNOME's vision of the desktop® on the Arch Wiki , proceeds to change some names to brake those unholy workarounds
- 52
- 106
Dall-E: will replace designers
— Chris Bakke (@ChrisJBakke) July 3, 2022
Copilot: will replace engineers
OpenAI: will replace copywriters
Product Managers are safe because AI can’t sit poolside drinking margaritas while giving thumbs up emojis in Slack yet.
- 3
- 10
I tried rdrama posts but the cloudflare anti-ddos settings on this site is blocking Google colab but archived links of posts should work if anyone wants to try
HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31967141
This notebook is part of a tutorial series on txtai, an AI-powered semantic search platform.
txtai executes machine-learning workflows to transform data and build AI-powered semantic search applications.
One of the hottest🔥 models as of June 2022 is DALL-E mini. There are a number of projects and examples utilizing this model as seen here, here and here. There have even been mainstream news articles covering this model.
This notebook presents a workflow to build a summary of a webpage and then generate an image of this summary. While there are a number of potential use cases for text to image models, this example is focused on showing the power of workflows and also provides interesting insights into how DALL-E mini "sees" the world.
- 2
- 11
Hackers with suspected links to China’s intelligence agencies were still advertising for new recruits to work on cyber espionage, even after the FBI indicted the perpetrators in an effort to disrupt their activities.
Hainan Tengyuan, a Chinese technology company, was actively recruiting English language translators in March according to job adverts seen by the Financial Times — nine months after US law enforcement agencies accused Beijing of setting up such companies as a “front” for spying operations against western targets.
Hainan Tengyuan is also part of a wider network of companies that has links, including common contact details and employees, with another tech firm Hainan Xiandun, which was exposed by the FBI in a 2021 indictment as a cover for the Chinese hacking group APT40.
APT40 is accused of cyber espionage targeting scientific research into Ebola, HIV, and Mers, as well as maritime industries and naval defence contractors across the US and Europe. Western agencies have also said the group was responsible for a hacking campaign against Cambodian opposition MPs, political institutions, and NGOs in the run-up to the country’s 2018 national elections.
Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder of security group CrowdStrike and now head of the Silverado Policy Accelerator think-tank, said the fact that the front companies were continuing to advertise even after FBI exposure was evidence that indictments against Chinese government personnel are becoming less effective.
While the first round of indictments against People’s Liberation Army cyber units in 2014 had sent “shockwaves through the Chinese system”, he said, such public accusations had become less of a deterrent given that repercussions for state officials tend to be minimal.
It is common for intelligence services such as the US’s CIA or the UK’s GCHQ signals intelligence agency to actively recruit prospective spies while at university and through advertising jobs publicly. But China’s use of front companies to disguise their work means some applicants are being drawn unwittingly into a life of espionage.
An FT investigation this week revealed that Hainan Xiandun sought to recruit foreign language students from public universities across China to help identify intelligence targets and translate sensitive documents.
Many were female foreign language students from universities on the tropical island of Hainan in southern China, seeking employment after graduation.
One student applicant had previously led a workshop entitled “The Fine Tradition of Secrecy of the CCP” at a local university. Another applicant had a summer job as a translator for foreign and Chinese executives at a golf resort.
Hainan Xiandun sought to leverage students’ language skills in its search for cheap translators, but its adverts did not divulge the nature of the work nor its links to the Ministry of State Security.
By contrast, Hainan Tengyuan’s job advert from March, posted on the Chinese language version of the recruitment website Indeed, appeared to be looking for more experienced staff.
It asked for applications from translators with at least five years of work experience, offering a monthly salary of around $2,000, more than twice the amount Hainan Xiandun offered the new graduates. Still, involvement in hacking activity was not made clear.
One security official in the region said that “multiple” Chinese hacking groups were known to recruit from universities, not only for linguists but also computer science students.
“They advertise positions and sponsorships within the front companies at local universities, and encourage students to engage in offensive intrusion activity badged as hacking competitions,” the official said. The official added that the ongoing nature of this recruitment would have “personal ramifications” for the students themselves.
Nicholas Eftimiades, an expert on Chinese intelligence operations and a former FBI agent, said that while intelligence communities around the world cultivate relationships with universities, “what is unique in China is the use of front companies that recruit students without their knowledge.”
He added: “It adds another layer of cover for the MSS, both from their citizens but also from foreign governments. It also provides a steady flow of cheap labour that doesn’t require security clearances.”
Links between Hainan Xiandun and Hainan Tengyuan were exposed two years ago by a group of anonymous researchers called ‘Intrusion Truth(opens a new window)’, who have focused on the work of the Chinese hacking group APT40 — also known by the names ‘Bronze’ and ‘Leviathan’.
The researchers trawled through recruitment adverts posted by self-described technology companies in Hainan and found links between five companies, including Hainan Xiandun and Hainan Tengyuan, which had overlapping company descriptions, postal addresses, contact details and employees.
According to corporate records, Hainan Tengyuan’s chief executive officer and largest shareholder Qiu Chuiqiang operates three restaurants in Hainan, one popular for its Cantonese-style barbecued meat. Efforts were made to contact Hainan Tengyuan and Qiu Chuiqiang, but they could not be reached for comment.
Western intelligence officials have intensified their warnings about the risk of “large-scale” Chinese cyber operations aimed at stealing data and intellectual property from adversaries.
FBI director Christopher Wray recently said the agency opens a new China-focused counter-intelligence investigation every 12 hours and that China has a bigger hacking programme than every other country combined.
James Mulvenon, an expert on Chinese cyber and industrial espionage, said it was clear that the regional bureaus, such as those in Hainan, tended to be “much more entrepreneurial in terms of targets” than bigger centres in Shanghai and Beijing.
Alperovitch from the Silverado Policy Accelerator said Chinese hackers who work as contractors fear being indicted more than state security officials do. Such hackers have “a history of curtailing activities after being named and shamed” because they have an interest in accessing western commercial opportunities and travelling overseas, he said.
The MSS and Hainan University did not respond to requests for comment.
- 16
- 36
- 96
- 17
I am not sure there are any that I can think of that completely changed how we were doing things. It feels like for the past seven years all we have been getting are fads as such or small iterative changes but nothing that suddenly made things way better or easier. Nothing on the level of the smartphone, or Uber taxi services, or even teslas.
I would love to hear your examples for some consumer level tech jumps if you got any, because as far as I can tell the past decade is a list of stuff that is all stuck in the development phase rather than the market phase as of now and will still take a few more years to take off.
So did we make any consumer level progress in the near past or not?
- 10
- 12
- 6
- 23
Zoomers BTFO
- 11
- 12
Or at least not have a toxic username
Wait...
The researchers emphasize that even among users with toxic usernames, most (between 58% and 65%) do not produce toxic content; this figure is about 70% for users with neutral, non-toxic usernames.
Discuss
- 1
- 9
In case this gets dramatic, rtechnews discussion
If you want to cause drama, might be a good idea to post this on /r/technology, /r/politics, and maybe /r/news
- 20
- 25
Orange site discuss: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31943478
The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC), a non-profit focused on free and open source software (FOSS), said it has stopped using Microsoft's GitHub for project hosting – and is urging other software developers to do the same.
In a blog post on Thursday, Denver Gingerich, SFC FOSS license compliance engineer, and Bradley M. Kuhn, SFC policy fellow, said GitHub has over the past decade come to play a dominant role in FOSS development by building an interface and social features around Git, the widely used open source version control software.
In so doing, they claim, the company has convinced FOSS developers to contribute to the development of a proprietary service that exploits FOSS.
"We are ending all our own uses of GitHub, and announcing a long-term plan to assist FOSS projects to migrate away from GitHub," said Gingerich and Kuhn.
The SFC mostly uses self-hosted Git repositories, they say, but the organization did use GitHub to mirror its repos.
The SFC has added a Give Up on GitHub section to its website and is asking FOSS developers to voluntarily switch to a different code hosting service.
"While we will not mandate our existing member projects to move at this time, we will no longer accept new member projects that do not have a long-term plan to migrate away from GitHub," said Gingerich and Kuhn. "We will provide resources to support any of our member projects that choose to migrate, and help them however we can."
GitHub claims to have approximately 83 million users and more than 200 million repositories, many of which are under an open-source license. The cloud hosting service promotes itself specifically for open source development.
For the SFC, the break with GitHub was precipitated by the general availability of GitHub Copilot, an AI coding assistant tool. GitHub's decision to release a for-profit product derived from FOSS code, the SFC said, is "too much to bear."
Copilot, based on OpenAI's Codex, suggests code and functions to developers as they're working. It's able to do so because it was trained "on natural language text and source code from publicly available sources, including code in public repositories on GitHub," according to GitHub.
Gingerich and Kuhn see that as a problem because Microsoft and GitHub have failed to provide answers about the copyright ramifications of training its AI system on public code, about why Copilot was trained on FOSS code but not copyrighted Windows code, and whether the company can specify all the software licenses and copyright holders attached to code used in the training data set.
Kuhn has written previously about his concerns that Copilot's training may present legal risks and others have raised similar concerns. Last week, Matthew Butterick, a designer, programmer, and attorney, published a blog post stating that he agrees with those who argue that Copilot is an engine for violating open-source licenses.
"Copilot completely severs the connection between its inputs (= code under various open-source licenses) and its outputs (= code algorithmically produced by Copilot)," he wrote. "Thus, after 20+ years, Microsoft has finally produced the very thing it falsely accused open source of being: a black hole of IP rights."
Such claims have not been settled and likely won't be until there's actual litigation and judgment. Other lawyers note that GitHub's Terms of Service give it the right to use hosted code to improve the service. And certainly legal experts at Microsoft and GitHub believe they're off the hook for license compliance, which they pass on to those using Copilot to generate code.
"You are responsible for ensuring the security and quality of your code," the Copilot documentation explains. "We recommend you take the same precautions when using code generated by GitHub Copilot that you would when using any code you didn't write yourself. These precautions include rigorous testing, IP scanning, and tracking for security vulnerabilities."
Gingerich and Kuhn argue that GitHub's behavior with Copilot and in other areas is worse than its peers.
"We don't believe Amazon, Atlassian, GitLab, or any other for-profit hoster are perfect actors," they said. "However, a relative comparison of GitHub's behavior to those of its peers shows that GitHub's behavior is much worse. GitHub also has a record of ignoring, dismissing and/or belittling community complaints on so many issues, that we must urge all FOSS developers to leave GitHub as soon as they can."
Microsoft and GitHub did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
- 43
- 25
I use UniFi everything atm. Really hard to beat the APs even though I should’ve stuck with pfSense for the router.