No email address required.
>Not Civ4
2 > 1 > 4 > everything else
Increasing complexity doesn't necessarily mean increasing quality.
4 had too many QoL fixes to be that low imo. One of those very few games with near infinite replayability.
Civ2 still pretty good though
Beyond the sword is the only game I still play from time to time.
You were almost correct but you forgot about SMAC
SMAC is good but unbalanced. And the AI sucks butt. Overrated.
Colonization was my favorite of the early SM strategy games. The CIV4 spinoff wasn't bad either.
>not civ 3
>not civ 2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
2 > 1 > 4 > everything else
Increasing complexity doesn't necessarily mean increasing quality.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
4 had too many QoL fixes to be that low imo. One of those very few games with near infinite replayability.
Civ2 still pretty good though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Beyond the sword is the only game I still play from time to time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You were almost correct but you forgot about SMAC
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
SMAC is good but unbalanced. And the AI sucks butt. Overrated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Colonization was my favorite of the early SM strategy games. The CIV4 spinoff wasn't bad either.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context