touch foxglove NOW 
soyboys will say 
"well actually heymoon time flows forwards, events in the future can't effect events in the past" 
Cool opinion bro, where'd you get it, Snopes? 
brainlet r-slurs timecucks will always say this which is how you know that they have LOW IQ and are SHEEP.
More precisely, Causes don't create Events, Events create Causes. An event that happens in the future creates it's own causes.
So imagine this. You get pancaked between two semi trucks on I-37. This happened because you didn't get enough sleep and weren't paying attention. You didn't get enough sleep because the baby in the apartment above you was crying all night. That baby existed because two people met in college and fell in love. They both got to that one college, out of all the hundreds of others that they could've chosen, because... uh.... i dunno bro trust me. It's a total coincidence that all of these things coincided!
^^^^^^TIMECUCKS ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS SHIT^^^^^^
In reality, the car crash happened. So the event of the car crash shot out beams from this central point that spiraled and defracted across time backwards. It shot a beam backwards from the car crash to the previous night when you didn't get enough sleep. It shot a beam backwards from this point to create the baby, to influence the parent's choice of college, etc etc.
Why did the car crash happen? Because it, too, was one of these beams connecting the present to some future event. And that event, similarly, connects to another future event, etc etc.
"buh buh buh heymoon!!! where does it all lead doe??????? heh heh... stupid guy... FALLACy detected"
WRONG. you HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. You don't know where everythign came from anymore than I know where everything is going. "itd wad the big bang!!!" oh yeah, idiot? what was before the big bang? oooh you don't know, do you????????? I guess that means that you are a wrongo idiot 5000. mental INFANT detected.
So, the real question is not "What was the First Cause" but rather 
"What will be the Final Effect".
discuss fellow antitimechads
.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
Links 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
its own causes
let's zoom in on what you just wrote there
you expect me to
your theory when you carelessly share your own thoughts with inaccuracies and careless abandon?
lemme break it down for you
the big bang is the big boot, and not boot as in a type of shoe-- boot as in booting up a computer. And not a computer as in its hardward-- computer as in its software. And not software like a program running on the computer, but the very kernel itself. And not Kernel like chicken-- kernel as in the string connecting the hardware to the operating system. And not string as in literal string-- string as in the the behavior of this container wherein which we reside which allows for sequential events to exist and persist.
"What was before the big bang?" A question derived from the luxury of the human mind which can pose nonsensical subjects of consideration, but wholly misleading in that it cannot serve as a literal question as a point to disprove the notion that a big bang occurred. If a server has been running for two years, asking "well what was there before the server?" It's a question that can only serve a theoretical endeavor, not as a literal inquiry, not too unlike "imaginary numbers" in maths.
Time is nothing more than yet another one of carp's larps trying to masquerade as some sort of divine existence, a mere misdirection if you ask me. See you've been tricked. There are no events, and there is no time. There's nothing but a series of events all happening at once, and our perception of time is a result of our incapable cognitive abilities to comprehend that everything has already happened, if only to attempt to describe it in terms of time-- like a squid trying to describe humans with its ink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
timecuck cope. things happen, these are events. and those events are the result of something in the future. no matter how far you subdivide an event it's still an event.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is a paradox in what you are saying. We perceive it as an event. What we perceive is simply irrelevant. Like finding meaning in the patterns of a license plate. It's our lack of capacity to understand that results in our creative output. It isn't a question of dividing further, that only serves to lunge us deeper into the illusion, but a matter of multiplying outward.
Sure, we noticed a neat little pattern and we describe it as "time" and "space" but not only are the two the same thing, but they are in fact stationary. It is not only so that the past is irrelevant, but the future is as well. We use time to describe a causal relation between change. The change itself is not predetermined, but is ultimately irrelevant. We are confined to the physics of this container, our abilities bound to never exceed that which is possible outside of our container. Our dreams of relevancy are just as significant as the patterns in the sand. Unless we somehow have some sort of influence on that which is outside of this domain. In either case-- time is our creative attempt to conceptualize change. Frankly you're just describing "state A" -> "state B" whether you call that transition between them
or
whichever way the arrow faces, the direction it comes from is the "past", for it is the state which preceeds the change to state B, from state A. Yet another creative conjecture to describe that which has no meaning.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You had a chance to not be completely worthless, but it looks like you threw it away. At least you're consistent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context