I strongly disagree with this, but it's possible for some men I'm sure. It's like an intellectually lazy answer when we don't want to acknowledge most men are just turned off by it.
I'll use myself as an example. I'm statistically in the top 0.5% for peepee size, probably higher. Absolutely not concerned a woman would randomly come across bigger. But even if she explicitly looked for a further outlier, I know that's not the be-all end-all of a great experience. I'm in phenomenal shape, very attractive, and I've put in the work to be a selfless partner who doesn't wield my peepee like it's all I need to bring to the table. Point being, I'm not insecure she'd come across a better overall option...even if there always are people who are better than you in some specific way. I know what I offer. I still care about body count and wouldn't commit to a woman with a high one. That's not going to change moving forward either.
snappy material
I honestly believe it's exclusively the first two but men obfuscate it with the last two.
As a guy, that's my take as well. It almost always comes down to insecurity or jealousy. The justifications will vary (because it has to be someone else's flaw), but those two are almost always at the core.
How about men who view s*x differently and are against casual s*x? Finding someone with different values. I e rejected a few women because of this and I just didn't tell them. It's more common than you think but most guys aren't going to say it to your face obviously.
It's even more bizarre how women shame men for having preferences.
Then don't have casual s*x?
How does this make it impossible to date women who have had casual s*x?
That's just my personal preference and I have different values. Instead of trying to change my mind why not find a guy who doesn't care at all? If it's not a big deal why waste energy trying to convince me my preference isn't bad?
Misogyny
did you read the other comments?
But STD you can get tested for, it is not like it will be a surprise for you and you can tell if someone has STD by their body count, and you can also wear protection when you date someone.
I mean I'm not going to argue with you about my desire to avoid catching an std, that doesn't seem very productive or really relevant. And having body count as a standard for marriage has zero impact on anyone other then the two consenting adults who enter into that relationship. So I don't understand why everyone gets angry when someone has body count as their standard.
internalised misogyny
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The question is kind of bizarre since you could just as easily ask men directly why they do what they do. But all the scrotes responding is pathetic. Also, I kind of want to see how well women are able to figure out men's thinking.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The men would reply in bad faith, men don't know what they actually want or think, best to bypass them and talk to the experts on the male experience, women.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context