:marseycoffee:

In case you're wondering, I wholeheartedly support this

68
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why would you move on so quickly and dismissively?

Because I am not a corpse worshipper.

Which part of love them to the fullest while they are alive not while they are dead do you not understand?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because they aren't going to suddenly go, "Well, he's a corpse now. Who cares about his dignity and memory?"

This is why I called you neurodivergent. You're trying to assign oure logic to something where it doesn't existin a normal, feeling person

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is a corpses dignity and memory destroyed by someone doing something or anything the next day unrelated to the corpse?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because you should be torn up enough not to immediately exploit their death. Again, these are normal human emotions, Mrs. Chandler.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is this exploitation?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's using her husbands death in an ad for her snizz spelunking

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but its not possible to exploit a corpse. Only the living can be exploited.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She cares so little about her man that she did this. Do you think people just die and the people who loved them to, "Well, he's dead and i feel nothing about him more. "

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you think people just die and the people who loved them to, "Well, he's dead and i feel nothing about him more. "

After the first 2-3 dead loved ones yes.

Or is adaptation unethical and a moral failing in your value system?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.