https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/516521/all-these-handwringing-articles-about-low-birthrates-makes-me-deeply-uncomfortab
Top Poster of the Day:
JimieWhales
Current Registered Users: 29,915
isn't 1 more than enough
/h/toomanyxchromosomes SETTINGS /h/toomanyxchromosomes MODS /h/toomanyxchromosomes LOG /h/toomanyxchromosomes EXILEES /h/toomanyxchromosomes FOLLOWERS /h/toomanyxchromosomes BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Foids are truly defective
They whine and complain about patriarchy and oppression, they do everything to get more rights than anyone else and privileged positions in society where they get everything handed to them. And the consequence of that is that these same societies who make this possible for them will inevitably die out and be replaced by societies that "oppress" them because the foids themselves lead the societal suicide of the very same one that gave them this freedom in the first place. They even accelerate this decline by championing the replacement of the native, pro-foid population by archaic, patriarchal groups flooding in to fill the gaps left by the foid let societal erosion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're clearly female maximalists, they only notice on the male question but balk when you notice on any marginalized minority. Imagine the reaction to saying blacks, including black women, need to be more strictly screened for everything due to crime rates. Anyway the West will just import more Indians and Arabs which they'll complain about while doing nothing substantial. No one cares about female feelings because females statistically don't kill people, why center the feelings of a population which doesn't kill when males kill far more for far less.
The entire thing about moids being more violent is the biggest cope in the universe because it's true and proof that Radical Feminism is a self invalidating belief system. RadFems have zero path to power, any revolution will fail, any reform will be overthrown, and any separation will be subjugated according to their own beliefs.
If political power comes from the barrel of a gun then political power is located on the Y chromosomes.
https://ovarit.com/o/WomensLiberation/516255/do-you-think-gay-or-single-men-should-be-allowed-to-adopt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel like I agree with your base-premise, but literally everything else is just a WTF
1. wtf is that "blacks" point even supposed to mean?
Seemingly just trying to force the black crime thing into the argument for no reason.
2. What's wrong with Indians? As someone living in Europe (Germland), I'd rather have 2x the number of
vs. the Arab plague we have right now.
3. How the heck is the murder rate between genders even slightly relevant to anything you're talking about?
Again, I agree with the underlying principle, but this just comes off like a fricking schizopost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My point is that RadFems use the same noticing as chuds making the same arguments of using crime rates to argue to restrict people's rights in elaborate utopian fantasies which can never happen. It is a schizopost doe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I always say that feminism can only exist with the toleration of men. Men control the military of just about every country in existence, most civilian weapons are owned by men, etc. Every "right" that women have has been gained by convincing men that allowing something would be better for them in the long term, or that it was immoral for them to deny said "right". Women in the workforce worked by convincing employers to take on additional labor and by having women work in factories whilst the men were serving in the military.
Radical feminist literature, such as SCUM manifesto, suggests women striking from work to collapse the system, which ignores the fact that men have spent thousands of years without women performing labor outside of the home, and could go back to that if they wanted to.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No we can't. We literally can't. You really think you could functionally delete 50% of the workforce and not experience a complete collapse of the entire system?
I mean, realistically, if we took the hypothetical of all women striking at the same time, it would literally collapse darn near every important system in every modern economy
And don't try to move the goalpost on this, we are talking about a hypothetical strike where all women just stop working (obviously not gonna happen, but I didn't bring this point up 
)
Imagine all female doctos/nurses striking simultaneously. If we assume that the strike is actually caried out and serious, that alone would cause the complete collapse of society within a few days, and that is the most extreme example. Even if all women in office jobs went on strike, it would cause a massive economic depression.
I know we just mostly shitpost here, but if we're gonna pretend to seriouspost, let's actually be realistic.
And this is not to discount your other points(!!!), I generally agree with the comments here, but sometimes it really just gets too chuddy/too close to The Motte (
)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You had a chance to not be completely worthless, but it looks like you threw it away. At least you're consistent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
oh no, I'd hate for my wages to increase dramatically all of a sudden. And what about the 100s of useless cafes?
___________________
Its time for you and me to rise up and strike back
Don't stop until we dominate
Won't you feel great when we exterminate
All organic life!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is assuming an equal dispersement of women throughout the workforce. Having left the house before, I can tell you that is 100% not the case. Medicine, and especially veterinary medicine are fricked. Most offices would be fine. Family law would cease to exist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If they struck suddenly, and completely by surprise, yea. The more realistic scenario however is that the strike would be planned and known for years before it was actually enacted, during which time, the scrotes wouldn't want to hire foids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Foids are partly responsible for third world immigration, but you know what else is responsible? The fact that people want cheap burritos and construction work. Mayos aren't going to go make a living picking berries. It doesn't matter how much they post on Twitter about wanting to be le based trad farmers. When push comes to shove, they're simply not going to do that work. Only desperate third-worlders will. And so it will continue until maybe AI improves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've never
seen a bot with this bad of a writing 
style.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context